Search for: "C/O Sellers"
Results 121 - 140
of 256
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2016, 9:23 am
Almost w/o exception, the bars don’t even pay attn to 1A, just apply their own rules as conservatively as possible. [read post]
25 May 2016, 5:00 am
Does the corporation have directors and officers (D&O) insurance? [read post]
20 May 2016, 2:03 pm
Lipton: eBay as a company has the ability to stand behind sellers. [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:30 pm
(citations omitted).Three other legal aspects also indicate to us that the result in Jenkins is erroneous.First, that holding is contrary to the Restatement (Third) of Torts, which explicitly applies the same liability standards to both prescription drugs and medical devices:§6 Liability of Commercial Seller or Distributor for Harm Caused by Defective Prescription Drugs and Medical Devices(a) A manufacturer of a prescription drug or medical device who sells or otherwise distributes a… [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:41 pm
ISP groups that make this possible could not exist w/o 512. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:20 pm
Yet courts allow search engines to continue w/o fear of losing safe harbor. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 4:42 pm
You don’t have to be an economist to predict what would happen to pricing in any marketplace when there is a shrinking number of buyers and an increasing number of sellers, and in a general way that is what is happening in the D&O insurance marketplace. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 8:10 am
[N]o one discusses that with me or mentions the cost. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:34 am
FIGLER FAMILY CHIROPRACTIC, P.A., A/A/O LINDA MANNERS, Respondent. 4th District. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 12:04 pm
What we want for ourselves to be protected from, at least w/o our knowledge. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm
The seller can be liable for rescission or damages. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 5:33 pm
Another memorandum: seller promises not to reprint w/o author’s consent, and will surrender copy to him when he shall require it. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 1:02 pm
According to the Court, “[t]o sanction an argument that Revlon applies only at the very endpoint of the sale process—and not during the course of the overall sale process—would afford the Board the benefit of a more lenient standard of review where the sale process went awry, partially due to the Board’s lack of oversight. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 12:37 pm
Famous in the field/big seller. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 9:29 am
§ 99B-5(c). [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 4:32 pm
Basic involved a class of sellers who sold in the face of defendants’ allegedly false denials regarding a contemplated merger. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 5:00 am
§201.57(c)(9)(i)(A)(4). [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 12:10 pm
C 12-01633 CRB, 2014 WL 2702726, at *10 (N.D. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 11:18 am
O’Neill, 53 Cal. 4th 335 (2011), where it held that a manufacturer has no duty to warn of hazards in another manufacturer’s product due to “foreseeability. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am
Dinwoodie: w/o empirical tools, you either end up w/judge as your empirical proxy or judge as normative decider. [read post]
