Search for: "C.B." Results 121 - 140 of 291
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2010, 9:36 am by Stephen Albainy-Jenei
The court construed “NOD/Shi-scid mouse” to mean a mouse strain produced by multiple backcross generations of a C.B.-17 scid mouse with a NOD/Shi mouse. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 6:05 am
§ 1407, and Transfers Actions to Northern District of Ohio even though Only One of the Class Actions was Pending in that District Thirty-eight (38) class actions were filed against common defendant C.B. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 5:01 pm by Moderator
Rul. 2007-28, 2007-1 C.B. 1039, identified each of the following jurisdictions as a beneficiary country for which there was in effect an agreement with the United States as described in section 274(h)(6)(C)(i) and for which there was not in effect a finding by the Secretary of the Treasury that the tax laws of the beneficiary country discriminate against conventions held in the United States: Antigua and Barbuda, Aruba, Bahamas, Barbados, Bermuda, Costa Rica, Dominica, Dominican Republic,… [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 1:40 pm by Andrew Koppelman
Drawing on Marx, Weber, and C.B. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 11:44 am by Randall Hodgkinson
When a defendant wholly denies committing the alleged acts, admitting evidence of prior bad acts to prove intent is error.. . . .Here, the disputed fact is whether Wells touched C.B., not Wells' purpose in entering her bedroom. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 7:20 am by Joe Kristan
 From the Tax Court opinion (my emphasis and links): In Notice 2004-83, 2004-2 C.B. 1030 (2004 notice), the Commissioner updated the list of companies and classes of delivery service that constitute designated private delivery services for purposes of section 7502. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Rul. 58-127, 1958-1 C.B. 42, the IRS concluded that a taxpayer who won a prize by submitting the winning entry in a contest was required to include the prize in gross income despite having directed the payor to deliver the prize to someone else. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 10:47 am by Glenn R. Reiser
Rul. 59-60, 1959-1 C.B. 237, § 4.01).Generally, in determining fair value, the judge should consider “‘proof of value by any techniques or methods which are generally acceptable in  the financial community and otherwise admissible in court. [read post]