Search for: "C.J." Results 121 - 140 of 1,502
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2021, 9:45 pm by Josh Blackman
Ct. at 2135 (Roberts, C.J., concurring in the judgment) (quoting Casey, 505 U.S. at 871 (plurality opinion)). [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 2:22 pm by Howard Knopf
  “Veni, vidi, vici”: Julius Caesar, 47 BC The more than ten-year-old effort by Access Copyright (“AC”) to impose a “mandatory tariff” through the Copyright Board on Canadian educational institutions is over in a quick, decisive, and devastating unanimous judgment from Justice Rosalie Abellaof the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”). 85 years of legislative policy and SCC jurisprudence are re-affirmed, vindicated, and continued. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 6:00 am by Albert H. Manwaring, IV
June 28, 2021) (Seitz, C.J.)The Delaware Supreme Court has recognized that the stockholder franchise is the “ideological underpinning upon which the legitimacy of the directors managerial power rests. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 4:29 am by admin
The Court held, per Crampton C.J., that the plaintiff’s motion to amend the statement of claim should be dismissed and that the defendants’ motion to strike should be granted. [read post]
30 May 2021, 8:57 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Nova Scotia Pharmaceutical Society, 1992 CanLII 72 (SCC), [1992] 2 S.C.R. 606, at p. 660; Mossop, supra, at pp. 581-82, per Lamer C.J. [read post]
13 May 2021, 9:20 am by Tom Smith
I’d be the last person to ever suggest an unvaccinated person go without a mask — I wore one everywhere since this thing started — but the symbolism of, say, a vaccinated Joe Biden still wearing a mask outdoors in defiance of CDC guidelines, or Kamala Harris releasing pictures of herself wearing a mask for a Zoom call, is increasingly obvious. [read post]
13 May 2021, 9:16 am by Tom Smith
The arrival of Covid-19 has crashed America on a paradox that reads like the plot of a bad Star Trek episode. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 2:59 pm by Josh Blackman
., Casey, 505 U.S. at 952–53 (Rehnquist, C.J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) (demonstrating that a clear majority of states restricted abortion in the Fourteenth Amendment ratification generation). [read post]