Search for: "Card v. State of Michigan"
Results 121 - 140
of 260
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2014, 12:40 pm
California Michigan v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:41 pm
& Light Co., 83 So. 19, 20 (La. 1919) Michigan Wilson v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 3:53 pm
Thus, the court says that it’s possible plaintiffs state a VPPA claim based on the disclosures to Facebook. [read post]
5 May 2014, 5:10 am
Two days later, [he] flew back to the United States. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 10:51 am
The local Friend of the Court then gets involved in the custody determination through the application of the Child Custody Act, rather than through a "best interest" hearing under the now-revised adoption law.Members of the Republican caucus in the Michigan House were apparently sufficiently moved by outcomes in Byron and cases like it to reach out to the Adoption Committee of the State Bar of Michigan's Family Law Section; the Committee authored HB 4648.In… [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 2:50 pm
And if you’re an employer in a Sixth Circuit state (Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, or Tennessee), you should be concerned. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 8:34 am
And if you're an employer in a Sixth Circuit state (Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, or Tennessee), you should be concerned. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 11:42 am
While Michigan is generally a very creditor friendly state, recently we have had some favorable decisions for debtors. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court heard oral argument in Sebelius v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 7:07 am
” In Ter Beek v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 2:54 pm
[1] Clapper v. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 2:31 pm
People v Scott, Michigan Dept of State Police v Sitz, Indianapolis v Edmond, People v Jackson and People v Trotter settled that a roadblock or checkpoint stop is a seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 4:43 am
The case, Ter Beek v City of Wyoming, involves the legal challenge brought by a card-carrying pot smoker against his hometown for an ordinance that was passed in response to the MMA.The challenged Wyoming ordinance subjects people to a violation for possessing marijuana on the basis of the federal prohibition of marijuana as a Schedule I drug, as set forth in the federal Controlled Substance Act. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 4:05 am
In Conway v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 4:18 am
Troy District Judge Kirsten Nielsen Hartig has ruled that Michigan's motor vehicle code provision criminalizing the operation of a motor vehicle with the presence of a controlled substance [marijuana] violates the equal protection clause of the Michigan and United States Constitutions.The case, People v Sulaka, arose in 2010 when the accused was allegedly speeding and, when pulled-over, could not produce a drivers license. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 11:25 am
In 1954, no one thought that affirmative action in education was in the cards. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:25 am
In Hart v. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 4:18 am
That was the question posed by a case from the Oakland County Circuit Court that went to the Michigan Court of Appeals.Now, on last week's remand back to the Oakland County trial court, an evidentiary hearing will be conducted in the People v Carruthers case to determine whether the accused was using a "reasonable" amount of marijuana by baking the pot brownies.Earl Carruthers was charged with illegally manufacturing marijuana when pot brownies and several ounces of "loose"… [read post]
30 May 2013, 4:44 am
In the Michigan case of People v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 8:06 am
Given the Court’s special solicitude for inmates who can make a compelling case of actual innocence, such inmates will continue to receive a “get-out-of-habeas-procedure-free” card; to receive actual relief, however, those inmates must also demonstrate a separate constitutional violation (apart from their innocence), at least until the Court revisits Herrera v. [read post]
