Search for: "D. STRICKLAND"
Results 121 - 140
of 422
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2014, 10:14 am
If the FRA and Amtrak cannot agree on the metrics and standards within 180 days, Section 207(d) provides for the STB to “appoint an arbitrator to assist the parties in resolving their disputes through binding arbitration. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:00 am
At its Conference on June 12, 2014, the Court will consider petitions seeking review of issues such as the justiciability of claims against a private battlefield support contractor in an active war zone, equitable tolling under the Federal Tort Claims Act, and a court’s authority to order a foreign sovereign to pay defaulted debt. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:15 am
§ 2254(d). [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am
§ 2254(d)(2) merely because the state court does not conduct an evidentiary hearing. [read post]
19 May 2014, 7:45 pm
Thompson, and encompasses both cause and prejudice to excuse the procedural default of a habeas claim; and (2) whether the Ninth Circuit improperly removed the prejudice prong from an analysis of ineffective assistance of post-conviction counsel as provided in Martinez and Strickland v. [read post]
10 May 2014, 3:24 pm
Accordingly, this court concludes that an evidentiary hearing would serve no purpose because there is no reasonable possibility that the allegations would be substantiated (CPL 440.30 [4] [d] [i], [ii]). [read post]
9 May 2014, 8:54 am
¡Buenos días aficionados del Relists! [read post]
7 May 2014, 6:45 am
McNeal 13-963Issue: Whether, contrary to Strickland v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 9:13 am
Against this backdrop, and recalling its two-prong ineffective assistance test as set forth in Strickland v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 11:37 am
We do not remand for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the state court unreasonably applied Strickland pursuant to § 2254(d)(1); we have already found that it did, without going outside the state court record. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:37 am
§ 2254(d)(2) merely because the state court does not conduct an evidentiary hearing. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 10:12 am
Plaintiff claimed that Jews who are white still receive kosher meals.In Strickland v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 7:40 am
As he put it to close the day, “record silence under AEDPA and Strickland means the State wins. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 7:12 am
Michigan does not dwell on this fact – I’d expect an early question at argument to nail it down. [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
A Kings Marijuana Possession Lawyer said that, on March 13, 2010, defendant was arraigned on a felony complaint that charged him with Criminal Possession of Marijuana in the Second Degree (PL §221.25), a class D felony offense, and lesser-related charges. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm
” The agency warns that “going to the wrong place can: [d]elay your application or petition; [c]ost you unnecessary fees; [and][p]ossibly lead to removal proceedings. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 10:04 am
Strickland, 185 Ga. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 2:42 pm
This was the ruling in the case of Strickland. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 3:35 am
Strickland Co., 160 USPQ 715, 717 (CCPA 1969).Petitioner did not dispute that the services in KCG's two registrations are essentially the same. [read post]
