Search for: "DOE No. 1" Results 121 - 140 of 168,161
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2024, 10:46 am by bklemm@foley.com
  The Notice does so by providing a new safe harbor that taxpayers may use to calculate the inputs for satisfying the Manufactured Products Requirement for solar, wind, and storage projects (the “New Elective Safe Harbor”). [read post]
21 May 2024, 9:45 am by Dennis Crouch
John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1 (1966) and supplemented in KSR. [read post]
These products are devices as defined in section 201(h)(1) of [FDCA] and may also be biological products subject to section 351 of the Public Health Service Act, including when the manufacturer of these products is a laboratory. [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:55 am by itars sis
Nevertheless, the AI Office’s role does not imply to verify or proceed to “a work-by-work assessment of the training data in terms of copyright compliance. [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:01 am by Doriane Coleman
A major milestone along the way between the two NIH decisions was the publication of the report Exploring the Biological Contributions to Human Health: Does Sex Matter? [read post]
21 May 2024, 2:45 am by Rebecca Daramola (Bristows)
 The CoA also ruled that SES’ position that claim 1 does not require a specific position of the antenna in relation to the screen was unfounded. [read post]
21 May 2024, 12:00 am
Illinois law does not specify a number, but a divorce involving assets totaling $1 million or more is generally considered to be a high-net-worth divorce. [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:30 pm by Jesse Peters
Blogpost 27/2024 Transparency and environmental policy are two key issues in the upcoming European Parliament elections. [read post]
ASIC submitted the Notification Clause was unfair within the meaning of ss 12BF(1)(a) and 12BG(1) of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) (ASIC Act) on the basis that it: imposed an unclear disclosure obligation on the insured; suggested that Auto & General had a broader right to refuse or reduce claims than permitted under the ASIC Act; and was liable to mislead or confuse insureds as to their rights and obligations under the contract. [read post]
20 May 2024, 7:54 pm by Adam Levitin
It does not, except for funding the Army. [read post]
20 May 2024, 3:43 pm by Xandra Kramer
However, it does include a rule on overriding mandatory provisions enshrined in Article 29(7) and accompanying Recital 90. [read post]
The amended statute also does not specify, and it remains unsettled, whether the amendments apply retroactively “to all proceedings commenced on or after January 1, 2020,” as provided in the statute, or only to agreements entered into on or after June 6, 2024. [read post]