Search for: "Daniel A. Thomas" Results 121 - 140 of 2,743
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2023, 1:59 am by Seán Binder
Thomas Grove reports for the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm by Legal Aggregate
In this annual roundup, we offer highlights of the commentary and insight that Stanford Law School faculty members provided on key SCOTUS decisions during this year’s term (beginning October 2022). [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 11:31 am by WIRED
Enlarge / The Daniel Patrick Moynihan US District Court for the Southern District of New York Courthouse. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 6:31 am
Christopher and Danielle Herrick, White & Case LLP, on Monday, July 10, 2023 Editor's Note: Maia Gez and Thomas W. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 6:31 am
Christopher and Danielle Herrick, White & Case LLP, on Monday, July 10, 2023 Editor's Note: Maia Gez and Thomas W. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 1:29 pm by Javier Dominguez
The FCA’s scienter element refers to a defendant’s knowledge and subjective beliefs, not what an objectively reasonable person may have known or believed, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in a unanimous opinion. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal How Judges Navigate Offers of Free Lunch, Trips and NBA Tickets Bloomberg Law – Zoe Tillman (Bloomberg News) | Published: 6/25/2023 Recent controversies over perks accepted by Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito have raised questions not only about the justices’ conduct off the bench and what they disclose to the public, but also about how the judiciary broadly enforces ethics. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Cambridge University Press has published Patrimony and Law in Renaissance Italy (2022), by Thomas Kuehn (Clemson University). [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 3:15 am by Seán Binder
Daniel Michaels reports for the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 3:21 am by Just Security
by Daniel Levine-Spound (@dlspound) Civilian Harm in U.S. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 8:42 am by Hannah R. Albion
It is important to note that, notwithstanding the careful treatment of Rogers by the majority, Justice Gorsuch’s concurrence, joined by Justice Thomas and Justice Barret, devoted it’s entire one-paragraph substance to this single issue. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am by Eric Goldman
Also, Justice Gorsuch wrote a concurring opinion (joined by Justices Thomas and Barrett) which said that “it is not entirely clear where the Rogers test comes from,” “it is not obvious that Rogers is correct in all its particulars,” and “serious questions” were raised about the test. [read post]