Search for: "Doe 8"
Results 121 - 140
of 52,576
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2011, 5:05 am
July 8, 2011. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 8:50 am
(2) Does Proposition 8 violate the separation of powers doctrine under the California Constitution? [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 2:00 am
The Center for New York City Law cordially invites you to a City Law Breakfast presenting Carmen Farina Chancellor, NYC Department of Education Speaking on: “Setting Priorities: Equity and Excellence for All” ✱✱✱ DATE: Friday, August 25, 2017 ✱✱✱ TIME: 8:15 a.m. ✱✱✱ LOCATION: New York Law School 185 West Broadway, Second Floor Events Center (Corner […] The post EVENT ANNOUNCEMENT: CityLaw Breakfast with… [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 4:05 am
., Aug. 8, 2016), a Minnesota federal bankruptcy judge held that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act does not prevent applying this provision to a family's donation of a box of 500 silver coins, valued at $12,000.00, to their church, Firestarters Worship Center. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 11:07 am
Unsurprisingly, the Prop. 8 supporters who brought this motion to vacate have indicated their intent to appeal the ruling. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 12:11 pm
The SBA’s Office of Hearings and Appeals does not have jurisdiction to hear an appeal challenging the SBA’s refusal to approve a joint venture for an 8(a) set-aside contract. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 11:53 am
- - UPDATE - - There are actually a whole host of funny ads designed to promote IE 8. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 11:14 am
What does a lawyer do at a suspension violation hearing? [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 8:50 pm
That ruling on state law does not by itself settle the question of whether the ballot measure’s backers have “standing” in federal court — a federal issue that only the federal courts could decide. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 9:49 am
Accordingly, we hold that sovereign immunity does not bar the petitioners' suit against these named defendants at the motion to dismiss stage. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 9:54 am
It is unclear whether the government lawyer who appears will argue about the “standing” issue, since the legal brief Verrilli filed in that case does not even mention it. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 2:23 pm
Department of Energy (DOE) (1) to export 440 Bcf/year of natural gas from the United States to Canada via Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, and (2) to export 8 million tonnes/year (approximately 397.6 Bcf) of LNG from Bear Head LNG’s proposed export terminal in Richmond County, Cape Breton, Nova Scotia to nations with and without a Free Trade Agreement with the United States. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 7:55 pm
The case, the couples argued, does not satisfy any of the Court’s traditional standards for granting review of a case, so review is not warranted now. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 11:14 am
Vicarious liability means one does not need to prove the defendant was negligent, but rather defendant was responsible for the harm caused by someone who was negligent. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 5:56 pm
How Long Does It Take to Find Out if I am Eligible? [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 7:04 am
It's a measure of the political clout that the other side has that, whenever the Supreme Court does something that the plaintiffs' bar doesn't like, a bill gets introduced to change it. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 6:57 am
Does he understand any of this? [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 1:01 pm
Does 1-27, where a group of 8 students are represented by the MittelAsen law firm, and 2 other students are represented by student attorneys from the University's Legal Aid Clinic, oral argument was held on Friday, according to a report from the Bangor Daily News.Student attorney Jason Rayne, a law student at the University of Maine, working with the Cumberland Legal Aid Clinic, argued the motions on behalf of the students represented by his clinic. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 8:38 am
Submitting a proposal for a task order under an 8(a) Government Wide Acquisition Contract does not result in automatic recertification of the offeror’s small business size status. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 1:52 am
"Does California law allow one group of citizens, by majority vote on an initiative, to deny other citizens a fundamental constitutional right? [read post]
