Search for: "Does 1 - 34"
Results 121 - 140
of 5,676
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2024, 10:14 am
§ 10786(i)(1) for medical-legal evaluator’s attorney’s fees and costs… Shamsian (Eliza) v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
., 34:11-56a4b. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:14 am
This bill does no more. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 10:30 pm
Nearly half of the jury members fell within the age group of 18-24, while the second largest contingent, comprising almost half as well, represented the age group of 25-34. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:08 pm
The relief has been in place in some form since 1 July 2013. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am
Rybolovlev admitted that it’s hard for him to trust people, but once he does, he trusts them entirely. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 7:59 am
50 Tips for New Paralegals 1. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
Moreover, as the respondents’ brief (at page 34) observes, “the Constitution refers to the Presidency as an ‘office’ roughly 20 times. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 9:14 pm
This time, Kansas City had that advantage, which meant the Chiefs had no choice but to go for it on fourth-and-1 from their own 34. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 5:12 am
Donald Trump, however, does get prosecuted for mishandling classified documents. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:27 pm
How often does it make wrong predictions or misclassify things? [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Respectfully, we also write to raise serious concerns about the reliability of Professor Lash's writings on Section 3 and to make clear what the historical record does—and does not—say.[1] By answering seven questions, we will show that (1) there was a First Insurrection, (2) John B. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
First of all, they are insufficient, particularly for those of us who approach The Collaborative Constitution wondering why it is that her work does not reserve a major role for "We the People" (this is to say, why it does no reserve a major role for the authors of the Constitution, and the “demos” referred to in the very idea of “democracy”). [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 5:22 am
Then, I argue that the geographical nexus requirement, in fact, is extremely difficult to defend in terms of the lex lata, legal policy, literature or practice.[1] This piece does not, however, discuss in detail the obligations in fact owed to Protected Persons in situations or territories once the geographic nexus requirement is rejected. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 2:01 pm
” CN2.com is reporting, “[o]fficers arrived locating the 34-year-old male victim on the ground of the parking lot. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
§ 1, cl. 1, likewise vests the executive Power in “the President of the United States of America. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Moab Partners LP,[1] a closely followed case that ought to address whether a purported failure to make a disclosure required under Item 303 of U.S. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:22 am
Cargill this term, the Court has been asked to decide the narrow question of whether a bump stock device is a “machinegun” as defined in the National Firearms Act.[1] However, embedded within the case is an issue that raises broad administrative law questions about how the rule of lenity interacts with agencies’ interpretations of statutes with criminal implications. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
The upshot: so long as a defendant says what the SEC wants to hear (or says nothing at all), he does not violate the No-Admit-No-Deny Provision. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:00 am
The CJEU held in Van Doren + Q (case C‑244/00, IPKat here) that a national rule, according to which the defendant bears the burden of proof of exhaustion, does not violate EU law, provided that it is modified if the fundamental principle of the free movement of goods (Artt. 34 et seqq. [read post]
