Search for: "Does 1 to 20" Results 121 - 140 of 28,554
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Second, the Act authorizes (but does not require) the President to seize any such assets within U.S. jurisdiction for the purpose of transferring those funds to the Ukraine Support Fund, which will be used to fund humanitarian efforts in Ukraine and Ukraine’s reconstruction and rebuilding efforts. [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”[3]   Thus, in some cases retirement funds will need to last 20-25 years. [read post]
8 May 2024, 5:17 am by Jan von Hein
The court referred the case to the CJEU for a preliminary ruling on the compatibility with European law (Art. 21 TFEU, Art. 1, 20, 21, 45 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights) of such a refusal based on Romanian law. [read post]
7 May 2024, 11:37 am by Doug Cornelius
IA-5653 (Dec. 20, 2020) Marketing Compliance Frequently Asked Questions A Reminder that Hypothetical Performance Does Not Belong on Your Website [read post]
In 2022, Governor Gavin Newsom signed AB 195 into law which altered the employee threshold requirements of MAUCRSA from 20 to 10 as follows: an applicant with 20 or more employees, or an applicant with 10 or more employees that submits an application on or after July 1, 2024, must provide a notarized statement that the applicant will enter into, or demonstrate that it has already entered into, and will abide by the terms of a labor peace agreement. [read post]
This note summarises ten key issues enterprises active in the EU should know about the Directive. 1. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am by centerforartlaw
”[20] The court found that the use of “MetaBirkins” may not be “artistically relevant” to the digital images and that, even if they were, the use of “MetaBirkins” may be explicitly misleading as to the source of Rothschild’s artwork.[21] The motion to dismiss was denied. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:58 am by Joshua Fox and Mallory Knudsen
SEC, No. 20-61007 (5th Cir. 2020), a case currently under review at the United States Supreme Court, which similarly assesses the SEC’s powers in enforcing securities law. [read post]