Search for: "Does 1-104" Results 121 - 140 of 1,709
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Consequently, the Board considers that a different apportionment of costs than provided in A 104(1) is not equitable. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 7:36 am by ricelawmd_3p2zve
Grand Larceny Penalties If a defendant is convicted of theft of services or property worth at least $1,500 but less than $10,000, he or she faces a term of up to 5 years in prison and/or a fine of up to $10,000 under Section 7-104(g)(1). [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 7:10 pm
Whether you are receiving a structured settlement as a result of the settlement of and payment of damages in a physical injury, wrongful death case,  or a workers compensation claim, such payments are excludable from gross income under the Internal Revenue Code  (IRC 104(a)(1) for workers compensation and IRC 104(a)(2) for personal physical injury). [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:32 pm
Last Thursday Advocate General (AG) Kokott handed down her Opinion in case C-104/18 P Koton Mağazacilik Tekstil Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ v Euipo (C-104/18 P). [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 6:44 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
§ 28-3-104(a)(1) provides that personal injury actions shall be subject to a one-year statute of limitations,” there is an exception to that rule in subsection (a)(2). [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 8:34 am by Andrew Berger
Plaintiffs Argue That the Single Award Limitation Does Not Extend to Different Actions Against Different Defendants In response plaintiffs contended that §504(c)(1)’s limitation of one award per work “for all infringements involved in the action” did not extend to other actions against different defendants. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 12:29 am
  Could Starbucks prove that there are special grounds under Article 104(1)? [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 8:46 am by Phillip V. Marano
Title VII of Pub.L. 101-650, 104 Stat. 5089 (1990), enacted Dec. 1, 1990. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 11:22 am by structuredsettlements
A non qualified assignment IS NOT a periodic payment, it is a legal instrument by which the obligation to make periodic payments can be transferred to a third party in cases which involve taxable damages, or more specifically, those damages that are not excluded from income under IRC 104(a)(1) and IRC 104(a)(2) There is no such thing as a qualified structured settlement fund. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 7:40 am
If the answer to Question 1 is "yes", does it make a difference if the relevant public observes those signs as signs to distinguish goods, or as mere embelishment of the goods? [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 6:17 am
See In re Miracle Tuesday, LLC,  695 F.3d 1339, 1343, 104 U.S.P.Q.2d 1330, 1332 (Fed. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 1:41 am
" Please find this Kat’s translation of the court’s head note (Leitsatz) in Bananabay II (case reference I ZR 125/07) set out below:“Where a third party provides a sign as a keyword to a search engine operator which is identical with a trade mark, without the consent of the proprietor of that trade mark, so that, on inputting the sign identical with the trade mark as a search term into the search engine, an electronic promotional link to the third party's website… [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 5:17 pm by Paul A. Prados
  McEachin either does not understand or does not care about the law here, and the media has taken off with the story.What criminal investigative powers does the Attorney General have? [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 12:18 pm
For purposes of IRC 130(c), the term "qualified assignment" means any assignment of a liability to make periodic payments as damages (whether by suit or agreement), or as compensation under any workmen's compensation act, on account of personal injury or sickness (in a case involving physical injury or physical sickness)— (1) if the assignee assumes such liability from a person who is a party to the suit or agreement, or the workmen's compensation… [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
On February 1, 2012, it filed a second expert opinion by Prof. [read post]