Search for: "Don Gartner" Results 121 - 140 of 228
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2015, 2:48 am
Gartner relied on numerous dictionary definitions and encyclopedia entries regarding the terms comprising the mark, as well as on Internet materials providing membership statistics for various Christian denominations in this country, and materials discussing the views of certain denominations toward pornography. [read post]
And even when defined, the CIO’s or CDO’s responsibilities and concerns don’t always mesh well with other divisional responsibilities. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 10:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
With all of the high profile data breaches that have taken place in recent months, cyber security is a critical topic at the top of just about everyone’s agenda. [read post]
The ICO states that the fact that most people don’t read privacy notices doesn’t mean that individuals are not concerned about how their data are used. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 4:00 am by Kate Simpson
Gartner recently downgraded their forecast for IT spend in 2014, and it caught my eye. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by Kate Simpson
I came away from New York with the (rather obvious) thought that: change will be slower if solutions don’t make things easier, better, faster and cheaper. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 8:10 am
While at Gartner, Andy was instrumental in the realization of many solutions that have become synonymous with the IT Industry. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am by Jane Chong
Unfortunately, software vulnerabilities don’t just cost end-users billions annually in antivirus products. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 11:00 am by Paul Rosenzweig
In this post I want to offer some extended thoughts on the question of encryption and its intersection with surveillance on the web. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/B3jsCpdN4E -> Industrial Control Systems Targeted By Malicious Attackers, Research Shows http://t.co/tR5QtADxxN -> Gartner: SaaS contract language regarding security is lacking http://t.co/wZ901OGyAD -> IBM Says SEC is Investigating How it Reports Cloud Revenues http://t.co/a4nSYt1YVh -> Canadian Co, Hootsuite scores $165M from top Twitter inves [read post]
20 May 2013, 12:53 pm by Frank Pipitone
 According to a report published by Gartner in 2008, the big four providers have almost 85% of the market locked down. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 9:32 am
Somehow I don't think that would work out too well for product development. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 3:44 pm by Rob Robinson
 http://bit.ly/Ru9ez6 (Sheri Qualters) Clueless About Cloud Computing - http://bit.ly/PFQrUI (Susanna Sharpe) Court Treats Degrading Online Postings As Protected Free-Speech Opinions - http://bit.ly/PJarpH (Eric Johnson) Email Security Basics for the New Admin - http://bit.ly/PAtnGZ (Jeff Orloff) Employers Can Hijack Your LinkedIn Account, Court Rules – Internet & Online Privacy - http://bit.ly/QvFU9I (Deane Katz) Five Questions To Ask… [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 7:10 am by Rob Robinson
Statutory Penalties Imposed to Deter Illegal Access to Satellite Television – http://bit.ly/R2eWaF (Catherine Kiernan) Acquire and Administer Immediately: Legal Hold and Remote Collection – http://bit.ly/IJljzZ (@OrangeLT) Big Data Squeezes Legacy IT Spending: IDC – http://bit.ly/Prh7nQ (Kevin Fogarty) Business Critical Applications Changing the Requirements of Tomorrow’s Private Clouds – http://bit.ly/PrfV3N (Jerome Wendt) California Moves to Protect Privacy of Social… [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 7:46 am by Rob Robinson
Samsung: No Adverse Inference - http://bit.ly/Pbz2xW (Jeffrey Gross) Samsung Sought to Beat IPhone With Galaxy Nexus, Apple Says - http://bloom.bg/PAdLk2 (Susan Decker) Apple-Samsung Jury: Verdict Form May Blow Your Minds - http://cnet.co/PzPHOk (Josh Lowensohn) Daily Report: Apple-Samsung Decision Could Have Wide Impact - http://nyti.ms/SJAVTA (NY Times) Samsung Neutralizes Adverse Inference Jury Instruction Concerning Deleted Emails… [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 1:53 pm by Eric
Typically these cases involve foreign defendants who don't show up, meaning that the court only hears one side of the story (the plaintiff's) and basically gives the plaintiffs whatever they ask for. [read post]