Search for: "Downs v. Correctional Medical Services" Results 121 - 140 of 495
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am by chief
They claimed to be under 18, but social workers decided that they were over the age of 18, despite there being some medical evidence in both cases to suggest that they were under 18. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am by chief
They claimed to be under 18, but social workers decided that they were over the age of 18, despite there being some medical evidence in both cases to suggest that they were under 18. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 2:18 am by gmlevine
The dissent in Loma Linda University Adventist Health Sciences Center, Loma Linda University and Loma Linda University Medical Center v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 4:06 am
Please direct corrections, comments, questions, subscription requests and inquiries to Mr. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 8:59 pm by TDot
Constitutional Law: Kelo v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 12:28 am by Caroline Cross
First, Mr Justice Bodey’s decision not to extend the test for “reasonably foreseeable consequences” (s.3(4))  from “proximate medical issues” to “social consequences” is surely correct. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
"Findlaw summaries [may] include opoinions that have not yet been released for publication and may be subject to modification, correction or withdrawl. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 3:23 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the Sept. 29 conference) Idaho Department of Correction v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 4:51 am by Jonathan Rosenfeld
 Doctors should ensure that they have a patient’s complete and up to date information before prescribing medication, in order to cut down on medication errors. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 3:33 am by Russ Bensing
And last week in Harris v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am by msatta
Board of Education or how we got to Obergefell v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Michalak v General Medical Council & Ors, heard 4 Jul 2017. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 7:21 am by Ilya Shapiro
He filed an amicus brief supporting the cert petition in NIFLA v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 2:56 am by INFORRM
On 30 December 2020 Warby J handed down judgment in the case of S (A Child) v TikTok Inc. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 8:06 am by John Elwood
Three other new relists involve challenges to the Defense Department’s policy respecting transgender service members, under which those found to have gender dysphoria would generally be barred from military service: Trump v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 1:26 am by INFORRM
Companies providing online services likely to be accessed by children – including apps, connected toys, online games, streaming services, social media platforms and websites offering other goods or services to children over the Internet will need to comply. [read post]