Search for: "E Merck" Results 121 - 140 of 393
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2014, 12:36 am
Mercks clash over law governing coexistence dealThe Merck v Merck trade mark dispute (real name: Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp and others) has already appeared a couple of times on this weblog [see here and here], with the further honour to have a dedicated poll on who between the Germans and the Americans should have right to use that much-contended name. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
We’ve made no secret of our distaste for the so called “heeding presumption” – that juries may presume that any alternative “adequate” warning would have been heeded by the plaintiff (or, in prescription medical product cases, the prescriber). [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 7:20 am
Dynamite in-house faculty speakers – more than 20 of them − including Actavis, Biomet, Bard, GSK, du Pont, Endo, McKesson, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Olympus, Roche, and Teva. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 9:36 pm
No Literal Infringement] [W]e conclude that there is no genuine issue of material fact relating to whether the TAKEONE device literally contains “at least one removable, replaceable transfer member[,]” [because the TAKEONE device lacks a seal when it is disassembled, it necessarily lacks the claimed “removable, replaceable transfer member. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 8:20 pm by Dennis Crouch
. , statutes of limitation are not controlling measures of equitable relief “); Merck & Co. v.Reynolds, 559 U. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014) Since 2010, I have been posting on the development of a new course I have been developing for our first year law school students, "Elements of Law. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 3:11 pm by Schachtman
Merck & Co. 924 F.Supp. 2d 477, 497 (S.D.N.Y. 2013); Pritchett v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am by Barry Sookman
I had the pleasure of speaking at the CIGI/Institute for New Economic Thinking, Toronto 2014 Conference called Human After All. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 1:44 pm by Tom Lamb
Lastly, as pointed out by this March 26, 2014 MedPage Today article, "Group Wants Testosterone Study Retracted": Several members of the Androgen Study Group have relationships with testosterone drugmakers, including AbbVie, Bayer, and Merck. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
March 29, 2013), the plaintiffs’ "slight" evidence of noncompliance nonetheless failed:[E]ven if a jury could so find, Plaintiffs have offered no evidence that the noncompliance at issue affected the FDA’s determinations and "specific authorization." [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 11:55 am by Bill Marler
  E. coli O157:H7 infection is also linked to the development of post-infectious Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS). [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am by Bexis
The following post is exclusively the work of the Reed Smith side of the blog.Sometimes the smallest, least significant type of lawsuit can illustrate cracks in the edifice of the largest, most consequential litigation. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/qDmsnfGJFq -> Google reveals avalanche of link removal requests http://t.co/lWd2K4FgRa -> USPTO Again Rejects Apple’s Claim of Pinch-to-Zoom Patent http://t.co/YrME6CTcOi -> Four Tips from Merck’s $180M Patent Damages Win Against Apotex http://t.co/znvGmK3isO -> Google scholar link to FOX BROADCASTING COMPANY, INC. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
-> RT McCarthy Tétrault’s IP litigators win more than $180 million judgment for Merck against Apotex for infringing Merck’s lovastatin patent -> Irish Supreme court dismisses copyright appeal in software infringement case, Koger v O'Donnell [2013] IESC 28 http://t.co/hXZOznIAct -> Japanese government considering copyright term extension http://t.co/5MI5RAuQOH -> What does Canada’s new anti-spam law mean for individuals and businesses? [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
L.D. 1980) (“[e]vidence that the drug was marketed pursuant to FDA approval . [read post]