Search for: "E. B. Jones" Results 121 - 140 of 902
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2021, 9:36 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
DUI defense attorney Brian E Arnold offers a free consultation if you are facing any criminal charges including Felony DUI. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 8:49 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
First, the court agreed with Brenda that the Petition failed to state a claim under rule 12(b)(6) for modification of custody. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
Rather, courts may find that the letter of intent is not a contract and yet still obligates the parties to negotiate in good faith.[13] Also, courts may may go beyond the language of the letter of intent to examine factors such as the context of negotiations and customary practices.[14] B. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am by Phil Dixon
The Court of Appeals determined that the trial court did not err because the facts in both cases were similar enough to be admitted for 404(b) purposes. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:27 am by David Post
I offer you the following wager: I have $20 that says that the winner of the 2019 World Series will (a) lose 31 of its first 50 games; (b) find itself behind in in the 7th inning of each deciding game of each postseason series; (c) not win a single game in the Series at home; (d) have a starting left fielder from the Dominican Republic and a starting pitcher whose eyes are two different colors; and that (e) game 6 would be played before a crowd of precisely 43,384, and (f) game 4… [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 10:09 am by Tia Sewell
Brookings senior fellow Michael E. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 5:43 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
” In actuality, E/C’s “intervening trauma” defense is a preexisting condition defense, albeit one without a factual basis, under § 440.09(1)(b), Fla. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 9:36 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
” In actuality, E/C’s “intervening trauma” defense is a preexisting condition defense, albeit one without a factual basis, under § 440.09(1)(b), Fla. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 3:30 pm by Kurt Opsahl
Rubin, Professor of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University John E. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 2:31 am by SHG
Edith Hollan Jones and the author of the circuit opinion, Jerry E. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 4:42 pm by Eugene Volokh
Jones, joined by Judge Carolyn Dineen King (with Judge Gregg Costa concurring in the judgment), held that Speech First had standing to challenge various University of Texas speech codes, on behalf of its members: The chilling effect of allegedly vague [campus speech] regulations, coupled with a range of potential penalties for violating the regulations, … [is] sufficient "injury" to ensure that Speech First "has a 'personal stake in the outcome of the… [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 4:42 pm by Eugene Volokh
Jones, joined by Judge Carolyn Dineen King (with Judge Gregg Costa concurring in the judgment), held that Speech First had standing to challenge various University of Texas speech codes, on behalf of its members: The chilling effect of allegedly vague [campus speech] regulations, coupled with a range of potential penalties for violating the regulations, … [is] sufficient "injury" to ensure that Speech First "has a 'personal stake in the outcome of the… [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 2:00 am by mes286
Ronnell Andersen Jones, Lee E. [read post]