Search for: "Ed Lease"
Results 121 - 140
of 665
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2019, 1:25 pm
The underlying idea is that such a contract is predominantly a lease contract regarding immovable property and the services aspect that coexists with the lease character of the same contract is diluted into the latter. [read post]
30 May 2019, 5:54 am
Salkin, American Law of Zoning § 13:16 at 13-133 to 13-134 (5th ed. 2018). [read post]
26 May 2019, 4:01 am
“History of Nuisance”, Chapter 1E in The Law of Nuisance in Canada, 2nd ed.. [read post]
17 May 2019, 7:42 pm
Salkin, American Law of Zoning § 13:16 at 13-133 to 13-134 (5th ed. 2018). [read post]
8 May 2019, 10:30 am
Op-Ed 1. [read post]
8 May 2019, 6:16 am
The asphalt company, the court explained, “failed to describe any injury to itself, either actual or potential, that has resulted from these alleged violations, much less an injury different from the general injury to the public at large that result[ed] from the Town’s alleged violation of the procedural requirements for leasing real property. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 9:28 am
The court denied a preliminary injunction against the hair stylist and noted that “questions remain[ed] about whether [the hair stylist] engaged in any active solicitation” when she made the two Instagram posts in question and that this issue would have to be resolved at trial. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 3:35 am
After closing on the purchase of the building, Glaubach announced the acquisition at a board meeting and offered to lease office space to the company. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
“Valuation Issues in Eminent Domain Litigation: What You Need to Know” Alan Ackerman, Esq. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9 See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit, etc R Co v. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 10:30 am
” (Citing Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dict. (11th ed. 2014), p. 1061.) [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 3:32 pm
., a test that greatly diminish[ed] the significance of entrepreneurial opportunity and selectively overemphasize[d] the significance of ‘right to control’ factors relevant to perceived economic dependency. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
(Pix © Larry Catñá Backer; Bronzino Martirio di San Lorenzo, 1565-69, Florence )Judges and lawyers tend to serve as the worker bees of the large jurisprudential colonies of semiotic communities ("They do all the work in the hive, and they control most of what goes on inside. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:39 pm
A landlord was to obtain a Certificate in order to lease its property to a tenant. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:39 pm
A landlord was to obtain a Certificate in order to lease its property to a tenant. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 2:55 pm
The affirmative defense of quasi-estoppel precludes a party from asserting, to another's disadvantage, a right inconsistent with a position she has previously taken. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 11:14 am
The ED Coordinator develops and implements ED initiatives, as directed; identifies opportunities for regional ED and the development of small businesses; works to secure funding for ED activities; promotes the Tribe in order to expand ED opportunities; and performs other related duties as directed. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 10:03 am
” Applying Lemon-plus-“no endorsement” – with “due consideration given to the Van Orden factors” such as the monument’s “placement, its physical setting, and the length of time it remain[ed] unchallenged” – a panel of the U.S. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 10:29 pm
Company sought to divert DTPA case against it to arbitration when court wouldn't dismiss it in its entirety. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 12:27 pm
” The Court thus “reject[ed] High Sierra’s contention the County is required to engage in discretionary review under CEQA for proposed structures that are compatible with timberland production zoned parcels as defined by Government Code section 51104, subdivision (h). [read post]
