Search for: "G. Lewis" Results 121 - 140 of 985
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2022, 6:21 pm
Richard and Mary Eshelman Faculty Scholar Professor of Law and International Affairs Pennsylvania State University | 239 Lewis Katz Building, University Park, PA 16802    1.814.863.3640 (direct) ||  lcb11@psu.edu   ABSTRACT: This contribution considers the challenges for semiotics, for the understanding of the conditions of meaning in relation to the human that is posed by a global obsession with the control of reality and its instrumentalization through the… [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 6:41 am by Florian Mueller
In 1998, 14 major teams founded the G-14 organization to present a united front vis-à-vis UEFA, which was a thinly veiled threat of taking matters into their own hands and setting up their own European soccer competition--unless certain demands would be met. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
Blackman, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, on Monday, June 27, 2022 Tags: Delaware cases, Delaware law, Director liability, Equity-based compensation, Executive Compensation, Fiduciary duties, Liability standards, Securities litigation, Shareholder suits Eclipse of Rent-Sharing: The Effects of Managers’ Business Education on Wages and the Labor Share in the US and Denmark Posted by Daron Acemoglu (MIT), Alex He (University… [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
Blackman, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, on Monday, June 27, 2022 Tags: Delaware cases, Delaware law, Director liability, Equity-based compensation, Executive Compensation, Fiduciary duties, Liability standards, Securities litigation, Shareholder suits Eclipse of Rent-Sharing: The Effects of Managers’ Business Education on Wages and the Labor Share in the US and Denmark Posted by Daron Acemoglu (MIT), Alex He (University… [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am by admin
The Bradford Hill Predicate: Ruling Out Random and Systematic Error In two recent posts, I spent some time discussing a recent law review, which had some important things to say about specific causation.[1] One of several points from which I dissented was the article’s argument that Sir Austin Bradford Hill had not made explicit that ruling out random and systematic error was required before assessing his nine “viewpoints” on whether an association was causal. [read post]