Search for: "Hastings v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 993
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2022, 10:48 am
As Justice Blackmun presciently stated in his dissent in Webster v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 5:48 am
§ 20-12-119(c) In Donovan v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 2:05 pm
The majority opinion in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 1:00 am
On Wednesday 29thnd June, the Court will hand-down judgment in the case of Hastings v Finsbury Orthopaedics Ltd and another [2022] UKSC 19. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 7:18 am
” Now the dean and chancellor of University of California Hastings College of the Law David Faigman is questioning the legitimacy of the Court after the ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 1:45 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 22/6/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October… [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 2:56 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 15/6/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October … [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission (2015) and Rucho v. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 3:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 08/06/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October … [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
White supremacists probably expected Plessy v. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
The theory that state legislatures are, when they regulate federal elections, immune from state constitutional limits enforceable by state courts is known generically as the “Independent State Legislature” (ISL) notion. [read post]
23 May 2022, 10:16 am
Tiburon Open Space Committee v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 25/5/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October … [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:30 am
In this post, Sophie Malley, a trainee solicitor at CMS, previews the decision awaited from the UK Supreme Court in Hastings v Finsbury Orthopaedics Limited and Anor. [read post]
19 May 2022, 2:04 pm
--Judicial SUPREMACY: One has to obey Supreme Court Precedent (inferior courts certainly burt maybe also everyone else (Cooper v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 9:01 pm
That was the knock, of course, on the infamous (and thoroughly discredited) Bush v. [read post]
16 May 2022, 3:01 am
At the same time, the Court will also hear the case of AA (Nigeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
12 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Perhaps the best starting point for analysis of the compelled-speech realm remains Wooley v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court suggests why that is a mistake on North Carolina’s part.In Berger v. [read post]
