Search for: "Hollingsworth v. Perry"
Results 121 - 140
of 343
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2013, 3:05 pm
Don’t look now, but Paula Deen is asking a fundamental question about the legal definition of racism… Continue reading »Follow Above the Law on Twitter or become a fan on Facebook.Tags: Hollingsworth v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 12:46 pm
In another case decided the same day, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:32 am
In an op-ed for the U-T San Diego, Harold Johnson criticizes the Court’s ruling in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:36 am
Windsor and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 1:14 am
It would also undermine the argument that Perry v. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
Perry. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 8:15 pm
In its widely reported decision in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 2:40 pm
Perry & US v. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 8:09 am
In Perry, the state of California (represented by a guy named Hollingsworth) asked for it to be reversed, which should have kept it alive. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 1:14 am
It would also undermine the argument that Perry v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 5:04 pm
In a one line order in Perry v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 3:37 pm
The one-sentence order immediately nullified a stay order issued last June by the Circuit Court in the “Proposition 8″ case — Hollingsworth v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 2:47 pm
Perry, United States Supreme Court (6/26/13)United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 1:09 pm
Panelists include: Linda Greenhouse, former Supreme Court correspondent for The New York Times Allison Orr Larsen, William & Mary Law School Theodore Olson, Former Solicitor General, counsel in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 11:55 am
University of Texas, Flori-duh, Florida, Florida Gators, Football, George Zimmerman, Guns / Firearms, Hernandezing, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 11:54 am
If that were not enough, the Supreme Court’s companion decision, Hollingsworth v Perry, No. 12-144, decided June 26, 2013, leaves in place a determination, under California state law, that same-sex partners could not be denied the benefits of marriage. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am
Court watchers continue to focus on Wednesday’s same-sex marriage decisions: Hollingsworth v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 7:17 am
We may celebrate the outcome in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:26 am
Windsor, declaring section 3 of DOMA unconstitutional, and Perry v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:13 am
United States (on the federal Defense of Marriage Act) and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
