Search for: "INDEMNITY MUTUAL" Results 121 - 140 of 443
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2016, 12:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
So the city offered to buy the property, which Hinga owns, at a mutually agreeable price? [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 6:30 am by Michael B. Stack
This should always be done by mutual agreement and direct negotiation. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 9:48 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
  Money doesn’t move from one contracting party to another unless predetermined and mutually agreed conditions are satisfied. [read post]
30 May 2016, 1:18 am by Sandra Sithole
So it had not proved that it had any rights to enforce the indemnity under the policy. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 5:47 am by Sally-Ann Underhill
In Shipowners’ Mutual Protection & Indemnity Association (Luxembourg) -v- Containerships Denizcilik Nakliyat ve Ticaret AS (The “Yusuf Cepnioglu”) [2016] EWCA Civ. 386, the Court of Appeal considered the juridical nature of a foreign statute which gives a victim (in this case, a charterer) the right to sue a defendant’s insurer (in this case, an owners’ club) directly without first suing the insured, and in the circumstances of the case, whether it… [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:34 am by Law Lady
Civil procedure -- Summary judgment -- Notice of summary judgment evidence on which adverse party intends to rely -- Trial court properly interpreted rule 1.510 as requiring adverse party to file notice in response to a motion for summary judgment even if the evidence upon which it seeks to rely is already in the record -- Insurance -- Personal injury protection -- Coverage -- Medical expenses -- Reasonable, related and necessary treatment -- Trial court did not err in finding that insurer did not… [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 4:28 am by David DePaolo
This is because our model focuses on total outcomes; cost is only one of several factors measured and it is measured in the aggregate with medical spend, indemnity spend, and claims expense. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 7:43 am by Patrick Bracher
In Viking InShore Fishing vs Mutual & Federal Co Ltd (41/205) [2015] ZASCA 21 (18 March 2016) the court found that the insurer was liable to pay the claim relating to the sinking of a vessel that happened on 8 May 2005. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Jon Gelman
Under the proposed plan of reorganization, all non-asbestos creditors will be paid in full and EnPro will retain ownership of OldCo and GST.The settlement also contemplates the dismissal and exchange of broad mutual releases in GST’s adversary proceedings pending against several asbestos plaintiff law firms alleging violations related to the concealment of evidence by those firms, which dismissal and releases would become effective upon entry of a final order confirming the plan of… [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company,[3] the Maryland district court held that when a law firm reimburses a customer trust account for which one of the law firm’s partners was the trustee, such loss would be considered a loss under both the “Direct means Direct” and “Proximate Cause” opinions. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 7:40 pm by Will Bland, IV
  The Fifth Circuit affirmed the District Court’s finding that W&T owed Triton defense and indemnity. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 2:48 pm by ADeStefano
 Where a broadly worded indemnity provision purports to indemnify a party for its own negligence, it will be void or voidable upon a finding of active fault (the party may still be indemnified for its vicarious liability).For years, however, the "Hogeland" exception has permitted an actively negligent landowner to be indemnified for its own negligence where sophisticated parties have negotiated the agreement at arms-length and have shifted the risk of loss to third-parties… [read post]
26 Dec 2015, 6:13 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The court noted, too, that the judiciary has repeatedly addressed and rejected arguments by insurers that their "other insurance" clauses permit them to avoid their policy obligations altogether by shifting the entire burden of defense and indemnity of a mutual insured onto a co insurer. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 7:53 pm by Kevin LaCroix
It is fine for Buffett and his billionaire board members to disdain D&O insurance (particularly given that the corporate indemnity that Berkshire provides is more financially sound than any insurance commitment would be), but persons of more ordinary means can ill afford to run the risk of uninsured board service. [read post]