Search for: "IPR Licensing Inc."
Results 121 - 140
of 278
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2014, 7:10 am
" SCVNGR, Inc. d/b/a LevelUp v. eCharge Licensing, LLC, 1-13-cv-12418 (MAD September 25, 2014, Order) (Casper, J.) [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 5:00 am
In Coho Licensing LLC v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 1:57 am
There has been discussion of China's Ruichuan IPR Funds .For example, in June 2014, IAM wrote:Last month, IAM reported on the launch of Beijing-based patent aggregation entity Ruichuan IPR Funds. [read post]
In an IPR Proceeding With Several Listed Petitioners, The Petitioners Must Speak With A Single Voice
27 Aug 2014, 11:47 am
Thus, companies considering forming or joining a group to file an IPR should consider that one consequence of filing a petition as one of several real parties in interest is that they will not have the opportunity to be separately heard. 505 Games, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 5:10 pm
Gene Dx, Inc. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 4:56 am
See Apple, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 5:30 am
Canada (Attorney General), 1997 CanLII 16693 http://t.co/OEPn4FaK6p -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2014-01-08: Telematics data sharing, competition law and privacy rights … http://t.co/RWgxWwi3Tv -> Copyright claim struck out for failing to plead chain of title, (AOM) NA Inc l v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 7:29 am
Major competitors in the market, like Chinese company AAC Technologies Holdings, Inc., license the technology from Knowles, indicating there is little dispute in the market about who owns the technology. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 3:20 pm
Major competitors in the market, like Chinese company AAC Technologies Holdings, Inc., license the technology from Knowles, so there is little dispute in the market about who owns the technology. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 4:15 am
See, e.g., Versata Software, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 4:45 pm
Innovation is a major driver of economic growth. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:45 am
Holdings, Inc. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 7:38 am
Indeed, most firms and IPR holders are repeat players that hope both to license SEPs and to have their technology incorporated in subsequent standards. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 4:15 am
CardioKinetix, Inc.) as reported yesterday by Patently-O. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 5:30 pm
CardioKinetix, Inc.) [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 8:06 am
If, for example, the structure, sequence and organization of the Java APIs is found protected on its own, while the particular lines of declaring code are not, then that's a broader IPR than one involving both elements. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 12:39 pm
All of those licenses include a cross-license to the licensee's portfolio. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 10:39 pm
Anubha followed this up with an update on the Indo-EU FTA negotiations, including India’s positive stance that it cannot go beyond the parameters of the TRIPS and its domestic IPR laws and its demand of being declared a data-secure country. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 1:00 pm
Footnote 10 of Apple's letter recalls what the FTC itself thought Google would actually have to do now:"Remarks of Chairman Jon Leibowitz, Google Press Conference (Jan. 3, 2013), available at http://www.ftc.gov/speeches/leibowitz/130103googleleibowitzremarks.pdf ('Google's settlement with the Commission requires Google to abandon its claims for injunctive relief on any of its standard essential patents with a FRAND commitment, and to offer a license on FRAND terms to any company that wants… [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 12:32 am
The distinction is illustrated in Fred Fisher, Inc. v. [read post]
