Search for: "In Re: USA et al." Results 121 - 140 of 372
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2015, 4:03 am
Circuit Court of Appeals in Pom Wonderful LLC v Hubbard et al | Biotech inventions: controversies, case law, uncertainties and financing.Never too late 26 [week ending Sunday 28 December] -- Arnold J on Ice cream van design in Whitby Specialist Vehicles v Yorkshire Specialist Vehicles | Adios to positive right of TM in Spain | Costs of Vestergaard Fransen v Bestnet Europe | Irish PTO on slogan TMs | Merpel summarises what’s going… [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 1:27 pm by Nadia Kayyali
Unfortunately, the wording of the House's USA FREEDOM Act could be seen as codifying these about searches—something we’re particularly concerned about. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 5:30 am by Renee Kolar
The Future of Class Action Arbitration Part II Part I By: Adam Prom  Ways for class arbitration to survive In light of the above class arbitration jurisprudence, it is evident that the Supreme Court is quite hostile to class arbitration. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:08 am by Schachtman
Furthermore, their suggestion that Gauley Bridge fits into their Marxist paradigm of corporate corruption of science (citing similar works by Michaels, Castleman, Rosner, et al.) ignores the robust debate from all sectors of society, including the scientific community, organized labor, political actors, industry, government, and academia. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 10:03 pm by Daniel B. Cohen
They found: “Despite the general belief that irrigation water poses a potential source of pathogens in food-borne outbreaks, there are relatively few confirmed cases in the USA. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 8:36 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
A post at Biomass Mag on the latest Gevo/Butamax court decision includes the text:According the SEC filing, the court ruling is not material to the business of Gevo and is not material to any of the company’s other pending litigation cases with Butamax.A press release issued by Butamax notes that the court granted its summary judgment motion for invalidity of the [Gevo] ‘375 patent,Hmmm, a ruling that claims of a U.S. patent to Gevo are invalid is "not material to the business of Gevo"? … [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 6:43 pm by Schachtman
Martin, et al., New York Evidence Handbook  318 (2d ed. 2002)). [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 7:28 am by Allison Trzop
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in Shelby County v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 1:15 pm by Amanda Traphagan
Texas Franchise Tax: Texas Supreme Court In re Nestle USA, Inc., No. 12-0518 (Tex., Oct. 19, 2012). [read post]