Search for: "J-M MANUFACTURING COMPANY" Results 121 - 140 of 534
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm by admin
Some notes on vexing issue, which fortunately has never serious issue for me. [read post]
27 Mar 2021, 1:19 pm by admin
Many current tort textbooks fail to mention the defense at all.[5] Tort theorists stress the importance of the boundaries between consumers and industrial enterprises, but ignore the frequent setting in which the purchaser is itself an industrial enterprise, and has independent legal and regulatory duties to provide safe workplaces with the products at issue.[6] Highly sensitive to the need to protect ordinary consumers from the predations of large manufacturing companies, many… [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Seventh Circuit (2021) (Easterbrook, J.): I'm still here, guy. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 4:39 pm by Jon L. Gelman
 Even the most recent CDC guidelines on face coverings, issued February 11, 2021, focus on prevention of exposure to droplets and state unequivocally “CDC does not recommend the use of N95 respirators for protection against COVID-19 in non-healthcare settings” [18].CDC has cited shortages of N95 FFRs as a key reason for limiting their use outside of healthcare, but in recent months the supply and availability of these and other NIOSH-approved respirators has increased as new… [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 7:22 am by Abby Lemert, Eleanor Runde
The field of cutting-edge chip manufacturing is narrowing, now occupied by just a handful of companies: U.S. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
Companies use letters of intent as a versatile tool to meet the needs of their business transactions. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 12:10 pm by Kevin Kaufman
Other policies require companies spread the deductions out over several years. [read post]
Use of pemetrexed disodium in the manufacture of a medicament for use in combination therapy for inhibiting tumor growth in mammals to which said medicament is to be administered in combination with vitamin B12 or a pharmaceutical derivative thereof, said pharmaceutical derivative of vitamin B12 being hydroxocobalamin, cyano-10-chlorocobalamin, aquocobalamin perchlorate, aquo-10-chlorocobalamin perchlorate, azidocobalamin, chlorocobalamin or cobalamin. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 2:48 am by Schachtman
In any extensive review of J-M documents, which have included visits to the J-M archives in Denver, Colorado, I have never seen any evidence that J-M removed or altered the warning labels that appeared on its asbestos insulation for sales to the United States military. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am by Schachtman
Given the nature of the insulation, Johns-Manville and other companies, affixed their warnings to the cardboard packaging in which the insulation shipped. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 4:23 am by Schachtman
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company, the court, applying Indiana law, granted summary judgment to a respirator manufacturer, on basis of the sophisticated intermediary defense, in a post-OSHA asbestos lung cancer case.[9] Similarly, in Bean v. [read post]
1 Aug 2020, 5:08 am by Schachtman
Coca Cola Bottling Company provided the initial rationale for what became strict products liability. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 8:03 am by Schachtman
During his years of employment, Owens-Corning had used both chrysotile and amosite in manufacturing Kaylo. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by Jon L. Gelman
In asbestos litigation, decades of research are available to identify site where a specific manufacturers product was present. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 2:43 am by Schachtman
Still, if you were the company that sold the whole bottle, you would love to have the thimble seller pay a 50% share; no? [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 8:06 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Rand J. did not require the presence of an evil or of evil effects in the Margarine Reference. [read post]
22 May 2020, 1:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
April 27, 2020 Schmehl, J.), the court granted a Motion to Dismiss filed by a product manufacturer on the basis that the manufacturer was not subject to personal jurisdiction in Pennsylvania. [read post]