Search for: "Jewell v. United States" Results 121 - 140 of 364
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2016, 8:23 pm by Kate Howard
Jewell 16-572 Issues: (1) Whether, under the Indian Reorganization Act, to have been a “recognized Indian tribe now under Federal jurisdiction” in 1934, a tribe must have been “recognized” at that time; and (2) whether, to have been “under Federal jurisdiction” in 1934, a tribe must have been located in Indian country—that is, on land over which the United States exercised jurisdiction to the exclusion of state… [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 8:16 am by Kate Tummarello
Most recently, we saw a troubling decision out of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in the case United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 1:20 pm by Shahid Buttar
Their courageous reporting has forced a mounting national debate over racially discriminatory state violence, an issue that has festered for centuries. [read post]
17 Dec 2016, 2:42 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Federal Trial Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/2016dct.htmlUnited States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 8:23 pm by Kate Howard
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit erred in refusing to apply the presumption that congress intends positive law to retain common law principles absent clear evidence to the contrary, United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 3:09 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Federal Trial Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/2016dct.htmlUnited States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 7:50 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Jewell (Official Tribal Government)Pueblo of Pojoaque v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 3:22 pm by Brooke Wahlberg
  In doing so, the Ninth Circuit reversed the United States District Court for the District of Alaska. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 5:22 pm by Cindy Cohn
The massive secrecy surrounding these activities means that – similar to U.S. persons in our Jewel v. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:21 am by Joy Waltemath
” Here, “by committing an ever-increasing amount of State funds to paying State employee salaries or overtime,” the federal executive “can unilaterally deplete State resources, forcing the States to adopt or acquiesce to federal policies, instead of implementing State policies and priorities. [read post]