Search for: "John Doe II" Results 121 - 140 of 3,339
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am by jonathanturley
That still does not negate the negligence — both direct and vicarious liability. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 2:36 pm by Matthew A. Seligman
That alternative plan would have violated Article II, section 1, clause 4 of the Constitution and 3 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:41 am by Norman L. Eisen
This repository contains a collection of information for researchers, journalists, educators, scholars, and the public at large. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:44 am by David Pocklington
Where a treasure does not have a monetary value there is still a heavy onus on those who seek its removal”. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 6:05 am by Michael Dreeben
This test stemmed from Justice John Marshall Harlan II’s concurrence in Katz, which articulated a “two-fold requirement” for finding a Fourth Amendment search: “first that a person . . . exhibited an actual (subjective) expectation of privacy, and, second that the expectation be one that society is prepared to recognize as ‘reasonable. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 5:55 am by Oona A. Hathaway
Tellingly, while the Obama administration retracted John Yoo’s infamous legal opinions on torture, Yoo’s equally problematic legal opinions on the use of force still stand. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 4:24 am by Michael C. Dorf
The 12th Amendment does not require a winning candidate to receive a majority of the Electoral votes that are in theory available (538). [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 5:55 am by Harold Hongju Koh
Under domestic law, the Obama-Biden legal theory concerning the use of force has acknowledged that war-making must follow Article II of the U.S. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
During my recent visit to Columbia Law School, Professor John Coffee shared with me a draft of a short article that later appeared in the New York Law Journal.[1] Coffee’s article assessed the prospects in the U.S. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 12:15 am by David Pocklington
[4] Re St John the Baptist, Penshurst [2015] (Court of Arches) and the guidance in Re St. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:11 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  Goldsmith's entire piece is simply odd, repeating familiar and weak conservative talking points ("the criminalization of politics") in service of something that he does not even seem to believe, given that he does not bother to bring up the consequences of failing to prosecute Trump.The weakness of the piece was unexpected enough to make me ask Professor Dorf if he had any idea what in the world Goldsmith could have been thinking, or why he even bothered… [read post]