Search for: "John Doe U" Results 121 - 140 of 1,255
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2022, 5:00 am by Emma Snell
John Hudson and Kareem Fahim report for the Washington Post. [read post]
”  Although this bill does not appear to have the support to be passed in this Congress, it is emblematic of the concerns in Congress that might later lead to legislation. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am by Bernard Bell
Thus, in the majority’s view “substantial burden” was not to be read literally, but as a term of art: [U]nder RFRA, the government imposes a substantial burden on religion in two—and only two—circumstances: when the government “force[s individuals] to choose between following the tenets of their religion and receiving a governmental benefit” and when the government “coerce[s individuals] to act contrary to their religious beliefs by the… [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:08 am by Bernard Bell
Pozen, Freedom of Information Beyond the Freedom of Information Act, 165 U. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Ginni Thomas Corresponded with John Eastman, Sources in Jan. 6 House Investigation Say MSN – Jacqueline Alemany, Josh Dawsey, and Emma Brown (Washington Post) | Published: 6/15/2022 The House committee investigating the attack on the U.S. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 3:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  2022 NY Slip Op 31706(U) May 25, 2022 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 156946/2020 Judge: David B. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:56 pm by David Kopel
Kopel, Bad News for John Marshall, 121 Yale L.J. [read post]
16 May 2022, 7:24 am by Dan Harris
As long as my business does not involve drugs or the flesh trade, if there is money to be made, we’ll do it. [read post]
7 May 2022, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
While Southern District of New York Judge John Koeltl does not mention sanctions, he does categorically dismiss the actions on various grounds. [read post]
6 May 2022, 4:39 pm by Eugene Volokh
"] From the opinion by Judge John Koeltl (S.D.N.Y.) in Chinese Americans Civil Rights Coalition, Inc. v. [read post]