Search for: "John Kendall"
Results 121 - 140
of 401
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2019, 3:58 am
” Additional coverage comes from Greg Stohr at Bloomberg, who reports that Justice Brett “Kavanaugh may hold the key vote in the case, given that Chief Justice John Roberts has voiced reluctance to have the court referee partisan gerrymandering claims. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 7:02 pm
” Brent Kendall and Alicia A. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 5:16 pm
Joshua Jamerson and Brent Kendall of The Wall Street Journal report that “GOP Sen. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 4:01 am
” Additional coverage of the argument comes from Kevin Daley at The Daily Caller, Andrew Chung at Reuters, Brent Kendall for The Wall Street Journal, and Robert Barnes for The Washington Post. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 4:01 am
For The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin and Brent Kendall report that “[a]lthough it followed an age-old ceremonial script, Thursday’s investiture couldn’t avoid implicit references to the political struggles surrounding the court. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 4:13 am
” At the Florida Court Review, John Cavaliere looks at Reynolds v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 3:45 am
” Brent Kendall reports for The Wall Street Journal that the justices “did leave open the challengers’ ability to gather information from elsewhere in the Trump administration, including by questioning Justice Department lawyer John Gore about his connection to the citizenship question. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 3:53 am
In a speech yesterday referring to “the contentious events in Washington of recent weeks,” Chief Justice John Roberts emphasized the independence of the Supreme Court. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 4:48 pm
“Brett Kavanaugh Confirmation Battle Tests Supreme Court’s Chief Justice; John Roberts, his court’s rightward tilt cast, has worried about political erosion of legitimacy”: Brent Kendall and Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal have this report. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 4:26 am
At CPR Blog, John Echeverria weighs in on Knick v. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 4:16 am
” For The New York Times, Adam Liptak explains that “that President Trump’s pick of Judge Kavanaugh could remake the court” because “[h]is confirmation would result in a rare replacement of the court’s swing justice, moving Chief Justice John G. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
., in her official and individual capacity, DARREN BROWN, in his official and individual capacity, JOHN LICATA, Esq., in his official and individual capacity, JASON M. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:24 am
” At Take Care, John Paul Schnapper-Casteras observes that a trio of opinions at the end of October Term 2017 “suggests this might be the year that the Court begins to meaningfully grapple with the constitutional implications of emerging technologies. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 8:32 pm
” Chris Geidner of BuzzFeed News reports that “The Supreme Court Upholds Trump’s Travel Ban; The 5–4 majority decision was written by Chief Justice John Roberts. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 9:54 am
” Brent Kendall and Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal report that “U.S. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
” For The Wall Street Journal, Brent Kendall reports that one of the grants is an antitrust case that “centers on allegations that consumers pay artificially high prices for iPhone apps because Apple maintains an exclusive marketplace for their sale and charges a 30% commission to app developers. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 8:23 am
Kendall are Executive Vice Presidents, and David Molin is Vice President, at Compass Lexecon. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 4:23 am
For The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin and Brent Kendall report that Husted v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 2:59 pm
Casto’s book The Supreme Court in the Early Republic: The Chief Justice-ships of John Jay and Oliver Ellsworth is exhaustively cited in the following article: Scott Douglas Gerber, The Supreme Court Before John Marshall, 14 U. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 4:29 am
At Vox, Dara Lind breaks down the argument, suggesting that Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Anthony Kennedy “appeared most worried about the national security implications of striking down the ban — with the idea that this would limit some future president from doing what needed to be done to keep America safe. [read post]
