Search for: "Just People, Inc." Results 121 - 140 of 8,735
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2024, 7:46 am by Eugene Volokh
Just as district courts must have the discretion to protect victims' need for privacy, they must also retain the discretion to prevent pseudonymous abuse. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:34 am
    While most people may think that they don’t have to worry about recalls unless they get a letter or postcard in the mail, that’s just not the case. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:56 am by LII Team
Constitution Annotated includes discussions of Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 4:13 am
People are saying that one can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) appeal about 95 percent of the time just by looking at the marks and the goods and/or services. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
There are a handful of other cases that reinforce the thrust of Ex Parte United States: People v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 1:30 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
“This concept of surveillance is a really scary thing for people,” Brunner said. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
Rybolovlev admitted that it’s hard for him to trust people, but once he does, he trusts them entirely. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Just over half (27) of those final rules are technical and of limited general interest. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:06 am by Mills & Mills LLP
In the days following, menacing people kept showing up to the home and asking for Pleterski. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm by Marty Lederman
  If we assume, as Trump does here for the sake of this argument, that Trump is covered by Section 3 and that he did engage in an insurrection—which is what Colorado determined to be the case—then it is much more than reasonable for Colorado to assume, as it did with Abdul Hassan, that Trump cannot and will not assume the office of President, despite the (wholly) theoretical possibility that two-thirds of both Houses might vote to alleviate his… [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm by Marty Lederman
  If we assume, as Trump does here for the sake of this argument, that Trump is covered by Section 3 and that he did engage in an insurrection—which is what Colorado determined to be the case—then it is much more than reasonable for Colorado to assume, as it did with Abdul Hassan, that Trump cannot and will not assume the office of President, despite the (wholly) theoretical possibility that two-thirds of both Houses might vote to alleviate his… [read post]