Search for: "Lorillard Tobacco"
Results 121 - 140
of 177
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm
Philip Morris USA (09-994); Lorillard Tobacco v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 2:03 pm
Lorillard Tobacco v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:36 am
The tendency of speech to send bad messages to children is not seen as a secondary effect, and neither is its tendency to cause harms that flow from such messages — for instance, tobacco use, Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 10:10 pm
She also refused to name a “tobacco czar” to help restructure the industry, saying that would intrude on Article III judicial power. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 1:06 pm
[JURIST] Three tobacco companies on Thursday joined a lawsuit [complaint, PDF] challenging a New York City Department of Health [official website] regulation [text, PDF] requiring stores to display graphic anti-tobacco ads where tobacco products are sold. [read post]
11 May 2010, 4:34 pm
As I mentioned earlier several tobacco companies, including Commonwealth Brands, Lorillard and RJ Reynolds, brought a lawsuit in the Western District of Kentucky challenging the constitutionality of many aspects of the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act of 2009 which brought the regulation of tobacco under the aegis of the FDA. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 8:51 am
Reynolds, Lorillard and Liggett & Myers are facing daily challenges. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 8:51 am
Reynolds, Lorillard and Liggett & Myers are facing daily challenges. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 11:29 am
Docket: 09-994 Petition for certiorari Title: Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 2:39 pm
(Lorillard Tobacco Company v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 7:37 pm
"); see also Lorillard, 903 A.2d at 740 ("When a term's definition is not altered or has no gloss in the [relevant] industry it should be construed in accordance with its ordinary dictionary meaning. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 12:17 pm
McKinley Jr. denied a preliminary injunction sought by a group of tobacco companies as part of a lawsuit they brought in August arguing new federal tobacco regulations violate their right to free speech. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 9:30 am
Consequently, this paper will argue that the ban will mainly profit major U.S. cigarette producers, Phillip Morris USA, Lorillard and Reynolds American Inc., allowing them to further monopolize the tobacco market under the guise of federal regulation. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 12:08 pm
Why did Altria, formerly known as Phillip Morris, RJ Reynolds, Liggett Myers, and Lorillard go along with the administration’s plan, enacted by Congress, to allow FDA regulation of cigarettes and other tobacco products? [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 3:49 am
Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 11:18 pm
Reynolds Tobacco Co., maker of Camel cigarettes, and Lorillard Inc., which sells the Newport menthol brand, filed the federal lawsuit with several other tobacco companies...It is the first major challenge of the legislation passed and enacted in June, and a lawyer for tobacco consumers doubted the lawsuit will be successful. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 3:53 am
Reynolds and Lorillard [corporate websites], filed a federal lawsuit [complaint, PDF] Monday challenging a new tobacco regulation law on First Amendment grounds. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 8:34 am
TISCH (Chairman and CEO of Lorillard Tobacco Company). [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 5:18 am
The defendant tobacco company moved for summary judgment on the warning claim, which was denied. [read post]
27 May 2009, 10:11 am
Reynolds Tobacco; Brown & Williamson Tobacco; British American Tobacco; Lorillard Tobacco; Liggett Group; Counsel for Tobacco Research-U.S.A.; and the now-defunct Tobacco Institute. [read post]
