Search for: "Luban"
Results 121 - 140
of 257
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2010, 3:35 am
Blawg Review is a blog carnival that rotates to a different law site every week, usually emphasizing a specific theme. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 8:55 pm
., David Luban), which thereby permits some willingness to avoid or evade the law to achieve deeper moral purposes or values, or a strong commitment to the authority of law, which prohibits any avoidance or evasion of the law (Brad, leaving, for the moment, the question of what an avoidance or evasion actually looks like).Ultimately, I think these points are also interesting because I think tthat one's perspective on how people in the world approach the law - respectfully,… [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 7:32 am
Moderated by David Luban, the panelists answered and discussed questions arising from short papers they had written on a set question: Is the concern of legal ethics the morality of lawyers, the morality of clients, or the morality of laws? [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 1:48 pm
At the session, David Luban, who had read all of the papers, posed questions to each/all of us to elicit discussion on the topic. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 9:53 am
David Luban's reliance on common morality doesn't help much because common morality, at least in the U.S., is also grounded in autonomous self-interest. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 12:54 pm
" In addition to Christine's article on the subject, those interested should see David Luban, Contrived Ignorance, 87 Geo. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
Furthermore, the normative justification for crimes against humanity continues to engage deep thinkers, as illustrated by a number of recent treatments by such scholars as David Luban, Larry May, and Richard Vernon.I explore some of the persistent normative debates and doctrinal ambiguities that surround crimes against humanity in my contribution to the forthcoming The Routledge Handbook on International Criminal Law, edited by our colleagues, William A. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 9:04 am
Fourth, notice that people like Wasserstrom, Gerald Dworkin, David Luban, and even our own Brad Wendel and Alice Woolley (not to mention our commenter extraorinaire Patrick O'Donnell), to name just a few, have special insights about the ethical justifications for lawyering that they might not have about, say, the law of retail commerce. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 3:09 pm
For example, Tom Shaffer's ideal lawyer has a lot in common with Luban's, but no one could label Shaffer's lawyer "individualistic" in her approach to decision-making. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 2:12 pm
David Luban’s analysis of the claim, for example, suggests that it is highly doubtful. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 9:44 pm
Luban (Georgetown University Law Center) has posted How Must a Lawyer Be? [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 8:08 am
Now, David Luban has offered this reply. [read post]
31 May 2010, 8:40 am
David Luban blogged about the matter at Balkinization, several of us chimed in with comments (Stephen Gillers, Marty Lederman, and me), and the comments became part of Luban's lecture. [read post]
30 May 2010, 9:27 am
Luban (Georgetown University Law Center) has posted The Conscience of a Prosecutor (Valparaiso University Law Review, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
28 May 2010, 8:47 am
For example, I think the perspective of David Luban, or of Bill Simon, would tend to orientate more towards decision in context than towards the application of a rule across circumstances. [read post]
27 May 2010, 9:10 am
Finally, David Luban has reviewed the Daniel Markovits book that we've discussed here at some length and which Monroe Freedman (with Abbe Smith) reviewed and criticized. [read post]
27 May 2010, 4:33 am
Luban (Georgetown University Law Center) has posted Review of Daniel Markovits, 'A Modern Legal Ethics: Adversary Advocacy in a Democratic Age' (Ethics, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
26 May 2010, 12:36 pm
David Luban (Georgetown University Law Center) has posted The Rule of Law and Human Dignity: Reexamining Fuller’s Canons (The Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
22 May 2010, 3:16 am
O'Sullivan, David Luban, and David P. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 12:54 pm
This isn't an original point with me -- David Wilkins and David Luban have both made it powerfully -- but it still goes relatively unappreciated. [read post]
