Search for: "Mark J. Ginsburg"
Results 121 - 140
of 180
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2012, 8:28 am
” Slip op. 40 (opinion of Ginsburg, J., concurring in part, concurring in the judgment in part, and dissenting in part). [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:42 pm
., at 26) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Taft & William J. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 6:37 am
Mark Sherman of the Associated Press reports that Justice Ginsburg is visiting Egypt and Tunisia during the Court’s recess. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 4:02 pm
Ryan Watson (GW 2007 / J. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:37 am
ALITO, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, in which GINSBURG, BREYER, and KAGAN, JJ., joined. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 6:26 pm
” Id. at 1783 (Ginsburg, J., dissenting). [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm
See also Hamdi, 542 U.S. at 549-551 (Souter, J., joined by Ginsburg, J., concurring in part, dissenting in part and concurring in the judgment) (government could not rely upon the AUMF to supersede an earlier statute limiting detention where the government was not acting in accord with the laws of war). [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
See also Hamdi, 542 U.S. at 549-551 (Souter, J., joined by Ginsburg, J., concurring in part, dissenting in part and concurring in the judgment) (government could not rely upon the AUMF to supersede an earlier statute limiting detention where the government was not acting in accord with the laws of war). [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 9:36 am
Senate Republicans on Tuesday blocked confirmation of Caitlin J. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:47 pm
Ginsburg) 4. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm
Ulen Introduction – John Colombo (PDF) Law and Economics in Japan – J. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 5:57 pm
Pincus) and Wal-Mart (Mark A. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 7:20 pm
Poulsen, Proxy Contests & Corporate Change: Implications for Shareholder Wealth, 47 J. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 7:51 am
Knights, 534 U.S. 112, 118–19 (2001) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 8:19 am
Hartwell, 436 F.3d 174, 178–81 (3d Cir. 2006) (Alito, J.) [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 1:05 pm
In J. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 7:57 am
But ties serving to bolster the exercise of specific jurisdiction do not warrant a determination that, based on those ties, the forum has general jurisdiction over a defendant.Slip op. at 9-11 (citations and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 7:34 am
J., and KENNEDY, THOMAS, and ALITO, JJ., joined in that opinion, and GINSBURG, BREYER, SOTOMAYOR, and KAGAN, JJ., joined as to Parts I and III. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 9:01 pm
That is no sanction at all”); Herring, supra, at 152 (GINSBURG, J., dissenting) (the exclusionary rule is “an essential auxiliary” to the Fourth Amendment). [read post]
