Search for: "Mark S Rogers"
Results 121 - 140
of 2,154
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2023, 7:01 am
Neither trade mark covered digital assets.The French fashion house sued Hermés for trade mark infringement, essentially referring to a risk of confusion for consumers, as well as trade mark dilution and cybersquatting.Defendant Rothschild mainly centred his counterarguments on the Roger test (as established in 1989 case Rogers v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 12:23 pm
You can get a sense for what the use of the putative mark was like at first use, if your data are rich enough. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 4:39 pm
Questionable factfinding is a big route of problems in Rogers cases—like district court ignoring criticisms of P’s survey in VIP. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
Many of us talk about Rogers in this way as a categorical rule, but the VIP case shows there’s nuance in those cases that can get lost. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 3:00 am
The Zeldin and Santos congressional campaigns had one more thing in common: they shared a treasurer, Nancy Marks. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 5:50 am
Aside from Djokovic and Nadal, Roger Federer, who retired last fall, is the only other player to pass the $100 million mark, with fellow retiree Serena Williams just $5 million short of that milestone. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:40 am
Bob Brauneis: Modern GIs seem so much like certification marks that Jeanne Fromer’s criticisms of the latter seem to apply--used to fight between producers to exclude some b/c there’s no effective concept of terroir to discipline the concept. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 2:01 pm
Mark Milley wrongfully overclassified documents relevant to the Pentagon’s response to the Jan. 6 attack, and submitted questions which might illuminate Milley’s intentions and the impacts of any illegal activity. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 12:35 pm
Under Rogers, the court needs to consider the expressive relevance of the accused work and whether it is “explicitly” misleading. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 9:54 am
Rogers v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:06 am
Katie Rogers reports for the New York Times. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 10:03 am
Several amici also pushed back on the Ninth Circuit’s ruling that VIP Products’ use of Jack Daniel’s marks was noncommercial. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 10:03 am
Several amici also pushed back on the Ninth Circuit’s ruling that VIP Products’ use of Jack Daniel’s marks was noncommercial. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 6:08 am
Trump’s relations with the Turkish strongman were further complicated by the former president’s extensive financial ties to the country. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm
Mike Rogers (R-AL) had to be restrained from attacking Rep. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 2:17 pm
Darrell West was joined by John Villasenor and Mark MacCarthy to discuss Gonzalez v. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 4:27 am
Article 7 goes beyond cancellation and provides the owner of a mark in a contracting state the right to challenge the use of a conflicting mark in another contracting state upon proof that the interfering party had knowledge of the challenger’s mark. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
That is why, in the end, Santos is likely to prove Will Rogers correct when he said, “You can’t fool all of the people all of the time. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
We have Roger Parloff on the Jan. 6 criminal prosecutions, Quinta Jurecic and Molly Reynolds on the Jan. 6 Committee, Tyler McBrien on climate security, Benjamin Wittes on the Mar-a-Lago investigation, Scott R. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:42 am
In reaching its decision, the Ninth Circuit found that Bad Spaniels is an expressive work and applied the test set forth in Rogers v. [read post]
