Search for: "McDonnell Douglas Corp." Results 121 - 140 of 177
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2011, 7:27 am by admin
Per the 1973 Supreme Court case McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 7:49 pm
--Bonefont-Igaravidez v Int’l Shipping Corp, 1stCir, October 14, 2011, No. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 9:27 pm by Sean Wajert
McDonnell Douglas Corp., 890 F.2d 698, 703 (4th Cir. 1989). [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 8:33 am by Melanie Osborne
 The court also found that Conitz failed to show the elements of a prima facie case of discrimination under McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 4:50 am
The Circuit Court said that Wharff’s disparate treatment claim pursuant to Title VII [42 USC § 2000e et seq.] was to be analyzed under the tripartite burden shifting framework laid out in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 8:49 pm by Francis G.X. Pileggi
The Court was guided by the analytical framework articulated by the United States Supreme Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 11:52 am by Lyle Denniston
The case’s origins go back to January 1988, when General Dynamics and McDonnell Douglas Corp. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm by Law Lady
Health Care Reform: VIRGINIA FEDERAL JUDGE DERAILS PART OF HEALTH CARE REFORM LAW, Commonwealth v. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 9:44 am
American NTN Bearing Manufacturing Corp., 495 F.3d 840 (7th Cir. 2007), to his claims. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am by Steven M. Taber
September 13, 2010, Volume 2, Number 26 The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 10:36 am
McDonnell Douglas Corp. (1978) 87 Cal.App.3d 626, 667-668.) [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
Background After graduating with honors from Harvard University and Harvard Law School, D.C. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 6:16 am
The plaintiff bears the initial burden of presenting a prima facie case and must show he or she is a member of a protected class, was qualified for his job, suffered an adverse employment action, and that others not in the protected class were treated more favorably [McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]