Search for: "NEW YORK DISTRICT EEOC OFFICE " Results 121 - 140 of 259
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2017, 7:02 am by Joy Waltemath
She introduced herself to 10 foremen at different schools, including the foreman at New York Avenue School. [read post]
By arguing that Title VII permits employers to discriminate against employees because they love or enter sexual relationships with people of the same sex, the Department of Justice broke with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the attorneys general of Connecticut, New York, and Vermont, and dozens of major corporations.As we argue, here, the DOJ’s position in Zarda is not only morally repugnant but also analytically weak. [read post]
25 May 2017, 6:10 am by Joy Waltemath
In addition, they would reduce the need for a network of field area and district offices. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
EEOC, the court ruled 7-1 that courts of appeals should review a district court order to enforce or quash an EEOC subpoena for abuse of discretion, not de novo. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
” Robert Barnes in The Washington Post, Adam Liptak in The New York Times and Jordan Rudner of the Dallas Morning News also report on the ruling. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 6:19 pm by Howard Friedman
The New York Times reports that Education Secretary Betsy DeVos had opposed withdrawal of the Guidance that protected transgender students, but that the President sided with Attorney General Sessions. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 3:18 am by Edith Roberts
EEOC, in which the justices will decide what standard of review courts of appeals should use when reviewing district courts’ decisions to quash or enforce EEOC subpoenas. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 6:42 am by Joy Waltemath
A little over a year after the employee began working in the bank’s New York Office as a team lead, she resigned to move to Los Angeles with her husband. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 7:35 am by Joy Waltemath
Even though the Fifth Circuit has agreed to an expedited briefing and hearing schedule, that schedule will not conclude before the new president takes office. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 2:50 am by Tennessee Employment Law Letter
District Court for the Eastern District of New York, which found that an employer’s conflict-resolution program, which its creator dubbed “Onionhead” or “Harnessing Happiness,” was in fact a religion under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [read post]
13 Nov 2016, 5:46 pm by Kevin LaCroix
It is important to note, as the New York Times observed, that changes in priorities can be made at top, but prosecutions and enforcement actions are handled by career prosecutors and staff. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
An article by Leslie Picker and Cecilia Kang in the New York Time’s DealBook discussed the regulatory scrutiny that will be applied to AT&T’s recently-announced acquisition of Time Warner. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 8:31 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
District Court for the Eastern District of New York granted the EEOC’s motion for partial summary judgment as to the discrete issue of whether these beliefs constituted a religion, while granting in part and denying in part CCG’s motion for summary judgment as to several other claims. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 6:08 am by Joy Waltemath
A program called “Harnessing Happiness” that a small company implemented to improve its workplace’s functioning satisfied Title VII’s definition of a religion, held a federal district court in New York in an EEOC enforcement action. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:14 am by Amy Howe
 In this case, the 2nd Circuit disagreed, reasoning that the New York law only regulates prices – not speech. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 7:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
From the Law BlogsEmployment Law Daily items posted by Wolters Kluwer[Internet links highlighted in color]Liability under New Yorklaw barring criminal history biasBy Marjorie Johnson, J.D.Unable to determine whether a provision in the New York Human Rights Law barring denial of employment on the basis of a criminal conviction (absent specific circumstances) applied only to “employers,” and if so, who could be considered an “employer” and, or, an… [read post]