Search for: "New York City Employees' Retirement System" Results 121 - 140 of 787
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2008, 3:58 pm
Recently, I blogged about a case brought in the US District Court, Southern District of Texas, by Apache Corporation, who sought a declaratory judgment supporting its exclusion of a shareholder proposal submitted by the New York City EmployeesRetirement System. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2019/2019_04534.htm__________________Disability Benefits for fire, police and other public sector personnel - Addresses retirement for disability under the NYS Employees' Retirement System, the NYS Teachers' Retirement System, General Municipal Law Sections 207-a/207-c and similar statutes providing benefits to employees injured both… [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 9:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Schneiderman announced the guilty plea of Linda Miller, 57, of Englewood, New Jersey, over the theft of more than $162,000 in pension benefits from the New York State and Local Employees Retirement System. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 1:53 pm
Accordingly, RSSL § 607-b (a) must be interpreted as written, applying only to "[a]ny member of the New York city employees' retirement system who is employed by the city of New York or by the New York city health and hospital corporation in the position of emergency medical technician or advanced emergency medical technician [ emphasis added ]. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Fund holds and invests the assets of the New York State and Local Retirement System on behalf of more than one million state and local government employees and retirees and their beneficiaries. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Fund holds and invests the assets of the New York State and Local Retirement System on behalf of more than one million state and local government employees and retirees and their beneficiaries. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Miller as the result of a New York City construction worker being charged with incompetence pursuant to §75 of the Civil Service Law due to "excessive absence. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 3:27 am
Overturning disability retirement decisionsGuidal v Trustees of the NYC Fire Department Article 1-B Fund, 275 AD2d 458The Guidal decision by the Appellate Division demonstrates the difficult test that a claimant faces in attempting to have a court overturn a decision by the trustees of a pension fund denying his or her application for accidental disability retirement benefits.William Guidal, a New York City firefighter, applied for accidental disability… [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:45 am
For example, Section 13-173.1 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York requires an employee subject to its provisions to "be in service" on the effective date of his or her retirement or vesting of retirement benefits. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
New York State has codified the doctrine of forum non conveniens as CPLR 327.* In Employees Retirement System for the City of Providence v Rohner, in which Credit Suisse Group AG, was named as a "Nominal Defendant", the Appellate Division opined  "There is no credible argument that a substantial nexus between this action and New York is lacking". [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
New York State has codified the doctrine of forum non conveniens as CPLR 327.* In Employees Retirement System for the City of Providence v Rohner, in which Credit Suisse Group AG, was named as a "Nominal Defendant", the Appellate Division opined  "There is no credible argument that a substantial nexus between this action and New York is lacking". [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 12:08 pm
" Matter of Doran v New York State & Local Police & Fire Retirement Sys.2. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 5:54 am
Citing Samadjopoulos v New York City Employee’s Retirement System, 104 AD3d 268,* the Appellate Division explained that while “the Medical Board is empowered to resolve conflicting evidence, it may not ignore medical evidence and speculate as to other causes of disabling medical conditions in order to rebut the statutory presumption. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Correcting errors made in determining an individual's retirement allowance even after benefits are awardedSmith v DiNapoli, 2018 NY Slip Op 08606, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentA one-time, 30-day overtime pay earned in the last year of a member's employment is excluded from the member's final average salary calculation as such payments are deemed "termination pay" within the meaning of  §302(9)(d) of the Retirement and Social Security Law… [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Correcting errors made in determining an individual's retirement allowance even after benefits are awardedSmith v DiNapoli, 2018 NY Slip Op 08606, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentA one-time, 30-day overtime pay earned in the last year of a member's employment is excluded from the member's final average salary calculation as such payments are deemed "termination pay" within the meaning of  §302(9)(d) of the Retirement and Social Security Law… [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:35 am
” The Retirement System conceded that there had been dissemination of a report prepared by Retirement System that contained inaccuracies and was stigmatizing. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Included were changes providing that "any public employee hired on or after July 1, 1976 would be enrolled in the newly-created Tier 3 [a system]  characterized as one 'designed to provid[e] uniform benefits for all public employees and eliminat[e] the costly special treatment of selected groups ... inherent in the previous program.'" An exception to this pension reform allowed all police officers and firefighters who subsequently entered or… [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Included were changes providing that "any public employee hired on or after July 1, 1976 would be enrolled in the newly-created Tier 3 [a system]  characterized as one 'designed to provid[e] uniform benefits for all public employees and eliminat[e] the costly special treatment of selected groups ... inherent in the previous program.'" An exception to this pension reform allowed all police officers and firefighters who subsequently entered or… [read post]