Search for: "Novelty, Inc."
Results 121 - 140
of 764
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am
We are stuck with design patent law, which expressly requires novelty, originality, though not nonobviousness and which is thus not fine under TRIPs. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 10:39 am
| No economic links, no exhaustion of the “Schweppes” mark in Spain | Rolling to a stop - Jaguar Land Rover shape trade mark rejected, this time by the UKIPO | [Guest Post] Novelty of Cripps Pink Apples under Council Regulation on Community Plant Variety Rights | Conference Report: “Artificial Intelligence: Challenges for Intellectual Property Law” | Airbnb rentals and communication to the public: do you need a specific licence for your TV/radio sets? [read post]
16 Nov 2019, 6:40 pm
Quoting Sony Computer Entertainment, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 6:43 am
Permakat Eleonora Rosati wrote about Warner Music and Another v TuneIn Inc, an important High Court of England and Wales "test case" about infringement of copyright in sound recordings under section 20 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 7:50 am
Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 12:23 pm
An attorney for the plaintiffs told Reuters the relative novelty of the internet doesn’t usurp the civil rights and employment law protections that Americans enjoy. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 3:34 am
Their very novelty would make them repulsive until the public had learned the new language in which their author spoke. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 2:05 am
Background Following the seminal case of Google Inc v Vidal-Hall [2015] EWCA Civ 311, this is the second significant piece of litigation arising from Google’s use of the so-called “Safari Workaround” in 2011-2012. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 4:38 pm
I am grateful to Jack Balkin for organizing this symposium and to the commenters on Rationing the Constitution for their close, careful, and generous engagement with my book. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 10:47 am
by Dennis Crouch American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 12:12 pm
Patent law changes are coming to Canada on October 30th, and IPWatchdog reported on a few “traps” that practitioners should be aware of.PatentlyO unpacked the Curver Luxembourg, SARL v Home Expressions Inc. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 2:35 pm
Supreme Court, June 10, 2019, Return Mail, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 9:15 am
Elavon, Inc., 2019-1345, 2019-1460 (Fed. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 9:15 am
Elavon, Inc., 2019-1345, 2019-1460 (Fed. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:11 pm
In some respects, the cases reflect the novelty of the issue itself and the defenses raised by the defendants. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 6:38 am
(“Phoenix”) and Jack Duffy & Associates, Inc. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 10:00 am
Well The Chamberlain Group, Inc. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 6:35 am
Jack Duffy & Associates, Inc. [read post]
31 Aug 2019, 6:46 am
Background The applicant, Mattel, Inc. invoked before the EUIPO invalidity division Article 25(1)(b) of the Community designs regulation (CDR) in conjunction with Article 4(1) and Articles 5 and 6 CDR stating that: prior design had been disclosed more than 12 months before the priority date of the contested RCD;the contested RCD lacked novelty;the contested RCD lacked individual character. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 7:23 am
The European patent was opposed by the appellant on the basis of lack of novelty and inventive step. [read post]
