Search for: "Other Defendants-Class III-a, Class III-b, Class III-c" Results 121 - 140 of 473
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2012, 6:24 am
When any person is found guilty of a violation of subsection (1) of this section, after trial or upon a plea of guilty or nolo contendere, the court shall conduct an investigation to determine whether or not the defendant is: (a) Addicted to a controlled substance; (b) In need of treatment for the use of a controlled substance; or (c) Dependent on a controlled substance. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 5:01 am by Chile Eboe-Osuji
It bears emphasizing that the reason the 7-22 ILC Class must be designated as a separate class is because previous cohorts of the ILC consistently took a different view of international law on the matter. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 12:26 am
The main arguments concerned the question of distinctiveness - inherent and acquired.BackgroundJaguar Land Rover (JLR) applied to register six 3D shape trade marks for their Land Rover Series 1, Series 2, Defender 90 and Defender 110 (the latter two including shapes with rear mounted spare wheels) in a range of classes of goods. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 8:21 am by Joe Consumer
The law firm obtains an expert opinion saying that (a) There are no lawyer-client duties owed to the defendant by the law firm in the administration of the Claims Facility, such as loyalty and confidentiality; (b) There is no lawyer-client relationship between the law firm and the defendant in the administration of the Claims Facility; (c) Therefore, the law firm is not bound by ethical rules, such as MR 4.2, which forbids a lawyer in representing a client to… [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 8:21 am by Joe Consumer
The law firm obtains an expert opinion saying that (a) There are no lawyer-client duties owed to the defendant by the law firm in the administration of the Claims Facility, such as loyalty and confidentiality; (b) There is no lawyer-client relationship between the law firm and the defendant in the administration of the Claims Facility; (c) Therefore, the law firm is not bound by ethical rules, such as MR 4.2, which forbids a lawyer in representing a client to… [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 7:24 am by Rebecca Tushnet
… [C]ommonality is satisfied where common questions generate common answers ‘apt to drive the resolution of the litigation. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 3:33 pm
Defendant's (a) filing of a motion for summary judgment that sought a judicial determination on the merits of the action, (b) request for the court to instruct the arbitrator to hear plaintiff's claims on an individual basis, and (c) attempt to remove to federal court did not constitute a waiver of defendant's right to compel arbitration of claim.2. [read post]
11 Sep 2021, 8:16 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
The remaining 24% membership interests were sold to investors denominated “Class B” and “Class C” interests, the Class B member having limited voting rights, and the Class C members no voting rights only an economic interest. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm by Maureen Johnston
Rocky Mountain Farmers Union 13-1308Issue: (1) Whether Section 211(c)(4)(B) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 6:49 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The court finds that it was not procedurally improper to consider the arguments made by Defendant presented in a Rule 12(c) motion. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 7:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
July 31, 2013) This is follow-on consumer class litigation over Clorox’s Fresh Step cat litter marketing (previous discussion of class action; previous discussion of Lanham Act prequel). [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 2:42 pm by Stephen Bilkis
C. 802), other than a single offense involving possession for one's own use of 30 grams or less of marijuana; Second, 237 (a) (2) (A) (iii) of the Act pertains to an aggravated felony as defined in section 101 (a) (43) (B) of the Act, an offense relating to the illicit trafficking in a controlled substance as described in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act, including a drug trafficking crime as defined in section 924 (c) of Title 18 of the… [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 1:30 pm
§360(c)(e) (1)(A)(i).What this section (new or old), combined with the Mensingprinciple quoted previously, means is that plaintiffs can no longer argue that a defendant’s device is wrongly classified. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
The bill would authorize certain classes of membership in the worker cooperative company, including a worker-member class. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 1:54 pm by Erin Bolan Hines
’s motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ consolidated class action complaint for failure to allege a concrete injury in fact under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). [read post]