Search for: "Party X v. Party Y"
Results 121 - 140
of 461
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2020, 1:33 pm
X amount is for tuition and the tuition balance is Y. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 9:46 am
A typical modification clause says something like this: Upon the affirmative vote of holders of not less than X% in aggregate principal amount of the Bonds, the issuer may modify, amend, or supplement the terms of the Bonds; provided, however, that no such action may, without the consent of holders X+Y% in aggregate principal amount of the Bonds, reduce the principal amount of any Bond. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 2:08 pm
" Typically, you compare and contrast: Rule X doesn't apply, whereas the text of Rule Y seems straightforward and governs.At the end of the opinion, Justice Sanchez tells us what period does apply. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 10:24 am
[v] Here, we do not seek to describe the precise modalities of the IAAA,[vi] or explore its potential political effects. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 5:05 pm
In Cash America [v. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 1:41 pm
There are tons of cases in which I think the correct legal result is X even though my ideological desire is Y. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:34 am
App. 3d 968, 977 (1979) (public offer of $500 to anyone who kills or seriously injuries any member of the American Nazi Party was constitutionally unprotected solicitation, because it was sufficiently specific); Sheeran v. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
Accueillie en partie (68 000 $). [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 5:00 am
However, the license was subject to two exceptions, namely to: use the polygons (including the associated geometry, namely x,y co-ordinates) for a purpose other than personal, non-commercial use or commercial or non-commercial use within your organisation; or sub-license, distribute, sell or make available the polygons (including the associated geometry, namely x,y co-ordinates) to third parties. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 12:14 am
Thus, if the shareholder-petitioner seeking judicial dissolution of a corporation is a citizen of State X, the corporation is a citizen of State Y, and a named respondent shareholder is a citizen of State Z (or any state other than X), there is complete diversity of citizenship and the federal court has subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 12:49 pm
Because let's say a plaintiff initially sues you for X set of facts, with Y cause of action, and that cause of action arises out of conduct protected by the anti-SLAPP statute, but you think: "Well, shucks, I could file an anti-SLAPP motion, but you know what, Y cause of action really is true, so I'd lose. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
App’x. 964). [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 11:06 pm
Elle fait donc partie de la procédure.[...]VII. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:42 am
XYPN is a financial planning firm that focuses on advising Generation X and Y clients. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
” McFarlin v. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 11:43 am
I have written about the upcoming conference: Super-Scoring? [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 10:55 am
Weight Watchers Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 10:31 am
Petitioner, Goldi Y. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 1:06 pm
Clorox Co. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 1:06 pm
That requirement does not extend to political parties. [read post]
