Search for: "Public Defender's Office"
Results 121 - 140
of 14,275
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
Specifically, for those positions that are not expressly listed by the clause's language, the Senate has two options if a defendant is convicted: first, the Senate may remove that official if the official holds an office at the time of conviction; second, the Senate may impose a lesser punishment, such as discipline, suspension, censure, or even no punishment. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
., filed 2/8/2024), in part asks the court to determine:whether Defendants’ unexplained demand for sensitive information infringes on AHI’s constitutional rights, including religious liberty, association, and equal protection, and the privacy rights of third parties, including their sensitive medical, legal, and personal information.The same day, the court issued a TRO (full text, scroll to Exhibit 7) temporarily barring the Attorney General's… [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 8:25 am
The Class Action Lawsuit In response to these unreasonable delays, the New Jersey Office of the Public Defender (OPD) has taken action. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 12:51 pm
Ricochet, a film by Jeff Adachi and Chihiro Wimbush, features the San Francisco Public Defender Offices's defense of José Ines García Zaraté. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 11:00 am
More than 50 remain unresolved, according to the Public Defender’s Office. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:14 am
The bill would not disqualify convicted defendants from holding seats in Congress or from being presidential electors. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 5:01 am
As explained below, we conclude that, in its context, the article's claim that Coleman "assisted with the prosecution of Michael Morton" was substantially true given Coleman's public involvement in his office's efforts to keep Morton behind bars by resisting DNA testing of the "bloody bandana. [read post]
SCOTUS Repeated Relisting of a Case on the Meaning of Race Neutrality--and a Plug for my new Article
19 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Here's the link again. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:46 am
But even if neither Willis nor her office is disqualified and her office is allowed to continue prosecuting this case, the damage done to the public’s perception of the case is incontrovertible.... [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:37 am
The clinic team worked closely with the public defender’s office to transfer all files and get them up to speed on the case. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:51 am
” “His case against Dechert, which is pending in New York’s Southern District, also names Gerrard and one other former Dechert lawyer as defendants. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 8:20 pm
Wilson avers: "The United States Supreme Court disables the states' responsibility to protect public safety, reduce gun violence, and safeguard peaceful public movement. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 8:30 am
Otherwise, the patterns under Margaret were remarkably similar to how José's office runs. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 5:01 am
" "Here's the Nazi's background! [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm
[Why did Jonathan Mitchell not vigorously defend Griffin's Case and Chief Justice Chase? [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 12:30 pm
But the Michigan Constitution protects the right to use property and engage in any business that doesn't harm the public. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
"[12] Meanwhile, a New Hampshire newspaper blamed "[t]raitors in the old lady's Cabinet" for "supply[ing] the conspirators with the means of insurrection from the public arsenals," such that "General Scott [was] hampered in his measures to defend the capital. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:25 pm
Presumably because it's inconsistent with arguments in his substantive brief (especially the Sea Clammers argument), and because I assume he wants to reserve the argument that the Joint Session of Congress on January 6, 2025 may not disregard Trump electoral votes on Section 3 grounds, he dropped this argument in his merits briefs.] [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:57 am
This lack of clarity could ultimately weaken everyone's online safety and security. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:19 am
To be sure, Congress, by two-thirds majority vote of both houses, can remove a disqualification from office imposed by the legal operation of Section Three's first sentence. [read post]
