Search for: "Rogers v. Superior Court" Results 121 - 140 of 269
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2015, 7:03 am
After a jury empaneled by the Middlesex County Superior Court convicted Roger Beattie of two counts of perjury in violation of 268 Massachusetts General Laws §1, Beattie appealed. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 3:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas case of Carassai v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am by John Elwood
That unhappy news, coupled with Letterman’s sign-off this week, is probably going to leave an entertainment void in your lives that we at Relist Watch very much hope to fill with, among other things, enough relists to make you ralph … or, “roger,” as the case may be. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
  In a judgment handed down on 23 February 2015 ( [2015] ONSC 1175), the Ontario Superior Court of Justice held that the operators of a right wing message board were publishers of defamatory material concerning a left wing blogger. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 12:22 pm
Superior Court), given that the earlier trial was in the federal court system (the D.C. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 5:33 am by Jim Sedor
Fulton County Superior Court Judge Ural Glanville ordered Holly LaBerge and the attorney general’s office to each pay $10,000 to cover the litigation expenses of the plaintiff, former ethics commission Executive Secretary Stacy Kalberman. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 5:31 am by Amy Howe
Superior Court of Noah Kai Newkirk, who was arrested in February for disrupting an oral argument at the Supreme Court. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 10:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Accession: if granting a party an adjacent market, is it because we expect the party to have superior ability to enter/manage? [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 2:10 pm by admin
February 25, 2014 In an interesting and important decision issued by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice on February 21st, the Court has now imposed a $500,000 civil administrative monetary penalty (“AMP”) against Rogers for failing to have performed adequate and proper testing in some Canadian markets for performance claims made in relation to its Chatr Wireless brand (see: Canada (Commissioner of Competition) v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 1:58 pm by admin
February 25, 2014 In an interesting and important decision issued by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice on February 21st, the Court has now imposed a $500,000 civil administrative monetary penalty (“AMP”) against Rogers for failing to have performed adequate and proper testing in some Canadian markets for performance claims made in relation to its Chatr Wireless brand (see: Canada (Commissioner of Competition) v. [read post]