Search for: "Saucier"
Results 121 - 140
of 140
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2007, 12:05 pm
Judge Shedd notes:"When resolving cases on the first Saucier question, courts sometimes state that the absence of a constitutional violation entitles the defendant to qualified immunity. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 6:19 am
" Graham, 490 U.S. at 396; accord Saucier v. [read post]
26 Aug 2007, 2:22 pm
It depends on all of the chaotic details that emerge in real time in real life. 13 Yet the method that we and many other courts have taken to address the mixed legal and factual questions posed by the Saucier test cannot easily, perhaps cannot ever, capture those circumstances in their totality. [read post]
26 Aug 2007, 7:28 am
They are beautiful and I thought my Saucier pot heated up faster than others I use. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 6:24 am
Saucier v. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 2:35 am
There is a case -- Saucier v. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 10:45 am
Saucier analysis is problematic and expected at this point in the case. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 12:56 pm
Justice Souter supports his point about objective reasonableness by dropping a "cf" citation to Saucier v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 3:39 am
" Saucier v. [read post]
7 May 2007, 7:11 am
u003c/span>A group of people that feel a little giddy when they attach a color exhibit to an opinion took a quantum leap by linking a Real Player video clip of the chase in the body of the opinion.u003cspan> u003c/span>While Harris's complaint gave the impression that he "was attempting to pass his driving test," the videotape showed Harris running red lights and weaving in and out at "shockingly fast" speeds in a… [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 4:47 pm
See generally Saucier v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 11:19 am
That is the "Saucier" formula, spelled out in Saucier v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 11:00 am
” Saucier v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 2:15 pm
Supreme Court in Saucier v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 3:21 pm
., Sam Bagenstos, in the comments) to remind me that under Saucier v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 7:56 am
Some of plaintiffs' claims as to actions against protestors constituting allegations of herding by force, unreasonable use of tear gas and pepper spray, and shooting them with nonlethal projectiles while they were not doing anything unlawful except not moving survive defendants' motions for summary judgment. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 7:30 am
One analogy that immediately sprung to mind was Saucier v. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 3:05 pm
(The Court made that approach necessary in its 2001 decision in Saucier v. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 9:30 pm
Per the standard set forth in the United States Supreme Court case, Saucier v. [read post]
16 Nov 2006, 1:46 pm
"As to the 4th amendment/1983 claim, the court holds that the officers were entitled to qualified immunity under Saucier v. [read post]
