Search for: "Shoe Show, Inc" Results 121 - 140 of 518
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2018, 3:59 am
It is now up to the Dutch court to decide whether Louboutin should come out on top, keep its Benelux registration and win its infringement action against Dutch shoe shop Van Haren. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 7:17 am by Joy Waltemath
New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc., where Judge Selya was recognizing that the absence of a need to use the McDonnell Douglas framework to prove discriminatory intent in failure-to-accommodate claims (because the failure to accommodate was necessarily “because of a disability”) did not affect the adverse-employment-action requirement. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 9:44 am
However, this point should not have been considered in the first place.As pointed out by the Singapore High Court in Allergan, Inc and anor v Ferlandz Nutra Pte Ltd, the registration of a mark “in block capital letters covers the use of the word in every font or style possible” (at [44]). [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 3:11 pm by Afro Leo
  It is already established that the red sole mark is indeed distinctive, and the acceptance of the mark’s distinctiveness shows what acquired, in contrast to inherent distinctiveness, can encompass. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 8:14 am by Elizabeth Kruska
To even cross that hurdle, he would have to show that he was a consumer. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
Independent ContractorModern Cleaning Concept Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2018, 11:15 am by Schachtman
Group, Inc., 639 F.3d 11 (1st Cir. 2011). [read post]