Search for: "State Board of Elections v Martin"
Results 121 - 140
of 206
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2014, 5:49 pm
Charlotte Mecklenburg Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1 (1971), (the famous school busing decision) and Griggs v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 7:02 pm
The only behavioral guidelines that Defendant required Plaintiff to follow were those set by the Maryland State Liquor Board and the adult entertainment laws. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 10:25 am
And so the—the process here is one in which, yes, the parties can go to the National Labor Relations Board and have an election. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 7:45 am
” The preferred method of realizing these objectives is secret ballot box elections conducted by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) so as to determine employee choice for a union by a majority. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 9:06 am
Circuit’s recent private delegation decision involving Amtrak, the Fourth Circuit’s recent antitrust ruling regarding the North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners, and the Supreme Court’s recent state-action antitrust immunity decision in FTC v. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 9:13 pm
In a high profile disqualification dispute, Covington & Burling was disqualified in the case of State of Minnesota v. 3M. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 9:38 am
Opponents of affirmative action remain free to advocate for their preferred policies in the manner and at the same level of government as its proponents,” id. at 32 — to wit, in statewide university board elections and in lobbying efforts before those boards and admissions committees, but not by way of constitutional amendment. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 5:28 am
http://bit.ly/Xp5RPv (Michael Maslanka) eDiscovery and Social Media: Recap from TLI Litigation Summit, Part II – http://bit.ly/QnpRA4 (Gina Rubel) eDiscovery: Resolving Issues Through a Collaborative Approach – http://bit.ly/XBIXES (Martin O’Hara) eLessons Learned: Interview with the Honorable Ronald J. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:14 pm
The editorial board of The New York Times criticized the Court’s decisions in Citizens United, Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom PAC v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 5:30 am
§3050(a.4)(4)(v). [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 11:48 am
The bill comes in response to a recent decision by the Maryland Court of Appeals in DeWolfe v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 11:30 pm
This case would represent a chance for the Irish judiciary to look at again at the Crotty v An Taoiseach, a case recalled with admiration by the barrister Vincent Martin in today’s Irish Times. [read post]
16 May 2012, 7:54 pm
Martin Stanberry In a sharp setback for the National Labor Relations Board (the "Board"), a federal district court in Washington, D.C. [read post]
16 May 2012, 6:54 pm
Martin Stanberry In a sharp setback for the National Labor Relations Board (the “Board”), a federal district court in Washington, D.C. [read post]
16 May 2012, 2:28 pm
Martin Stanberry In a sharp setback for the National Labor Relations Board (the “Board”), a federal district court in Washington, D.C. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 7:39 am
” | Williams Mullen – bit.ly/yVP7EM (Monica McCarroll, Stephen Anthony) Ooops, They Did it Again – Jurors Continue to Improperly Use Internet, and Courts Struggle with Solutions – bit.ly/wmffPX (Gibbons) Pippins Court Affirms Need for Cooperation and Proportionality in eDiscovery – bit.ly/AuGsUO (Philip Favro) Planning is Key in Corporate Fraud Risk Management – bit.ly/x02ZBG (Catherine Dunn) SOPA and PIPA Have Been Shelved | eDiscovery Law Alert –… [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 12:37 pm
The Board of Education didn’t end segregation. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 3:23 am
In 1954, Brown v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 6:46 am
” Rick Hasen of the Election Law Blog notes that the orders released by the Court on Friday did not act on Bluman v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 1:36 pm
Queens Republican and former lieutenant governor candidate Tom Ognibene, Democratic State Senator Martin Dilan, and the New York State Conservative Party, among others, sued the New York City Campaign Finance Board and City officials, challenging the “pay-to-play” restrictions as unduly burdening protected political speech and violating the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment; citing the U.S. [read post]
