Search for: "State of North Carolina, ex rel"
Results 121 - 140
of 208
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
The post News Roundup appeared first on North Carolina Criminal Law. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 8:00 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 11:10 am
Arnold is admitted to practice in all state and administrative courts in North Carolina, before the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, and before the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 4:07 am
Here is the opinion in State ex rel. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 10:43 am
Farm employers are not subject to many federal labor laws and, in many states, are not included within the scope of the state workers' compensation provisions. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
It asks whether “the Fourth Circuit contravene[d] § 2254 (d)(1) when it granted habeas relief on the ground that the North Carolina state courts unreasonably applied ‘clearly established’ law when they held that third-party religious discussions with jurors did not concern ‘the matter[s] pending before the jury[.] [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm
§ 2254(d)(1) when it granted habeas relief on the ground that the North Carolina state courts unreasonably applied "clearly established" law when they held that third-party religious discussions with jurors did not concern "the matter[s] pending before the jury. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm
It asks whether “the Fourth Circuit contravene[d] § 2254 (d)(1) when it granted habeas relief on the ground that the North Carolina state courts unreasonably applied ‘clearly established’ law when they held that third-party religious discussions with jurors did not concern ‘the matter[s] pending before the jury[.] [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 11:24 am
Casey regardless of the geographical availability of abortion services in adjoining states in light of the equal protection principle articulated in Missouri ex rel. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:29 am
For the first time since this crusty old man was on the bar mitzvah circuit, the United States has a Triple Crown winner. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:00 am
Casey regardless of the geographical availability of abortion services in adjoining states in light of the equal protection principle articulated in Missouri ex rel. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 5:59 pm
Casey regardless of the geographical availability of abortion services in adjoining states in light of the equal protection principle articulated in Missouri ex rel. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am
Barnes, 14-395, a state-on-top habeas case involving jurors who received third-party religious advice on the death penalty, asks whether “the Fourth Circuit contravene[d] § 2254 (d)(1) when it granted habeas relief on the ground that the North Carolina state courts unreasonably applied ‘clearly established’ law when they held that third-party religious discussions with jurors did not concern ‘the matter[s] pending before the jury[.] [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 12:28 pm
Arnold is admitted to practice in all state and administrative courts in North Carolina, before the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, and before the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm
The petition asks whether “the Fourth Circuit contravene[d] § 2254 (d)(1) when it granted habeas relief on the ground that the North Carolina state courts unreasonably applied ‘clearly established’ law when they held that third-party religious discussions with jurors did not concern ‘the matter[s] pending before the jury[.] [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:19 am
Casey regardless of the geographical availability of abortion services in adjoining states in light of the equal protection principle articulated in Missouri ex rel. [read post]
13 May 2015, 9:32 am
There’s no North Carolina case on point, but the Supreme Court of Colorado reached that conclusion in State v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 9:33 am
During the early years of the Progressive era, signs surfaced, most notably in State ex rel. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 5:18 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 7:42 am
The defendants argued that the audit report was “publicly disclosed” because, theoretically, a member of the public could have pursued the document through a public records request under either the North Carolina Public Records Act or through “a federal clearinghouse. [read post]
