Search for: "Stephen Kennedy-Good" Results 121 - 140 of 562
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2018, 5:21 am by Andrew Hamm
Wade, the landmark Supreme Court case that legalized abortion nationwide, should not be overturned ‘unless there’s a good reason,’” Max Greenwood reports for The Hill. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 2:28 am
  Arguing for the tobacco company will be Stephen M. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 12:51 pm by Mark Walsh
Joanna Breyer, the wife of Justice Stephen Breyer, also files into the section. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 5:28 pm by Derek Muller
Since Kennedy’s solo opinion in Vieth v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 12:20 pm by Richard Sander
During the spring of 2013, however, Justice Stephen Breyer approached Kennedy with word that Justice Sotomayor had prepared a blistering dissent, which Breyer thought would create national and intra-court wounds that might be difficult to heal. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 8:55 am by Victoria Kwan
Video of the panel is available via The Kennedy Center. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 8:08 am
Exactly how many times will it take for our good state to get the point? [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 10:47 am by Amy Howe
And when Yang eventually conceded that the jury instructions were not “perfect,” but were good enough, Kennedy challenged him to provide a citation that the court could use to support that proposition. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 12:11 pm by Ilya Somin
That’s not only good news for sports bettors, it’s also good news for constitutional federalism. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 12:47 pm by Mark Walsh
Justice Stephen Breyer is next with the opinion in McWilliams v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 5:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Roberts’ opinion, for himself, Kennedy, and the four liberal justices – Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan – seemed to alter the rules of Chevron deference for interpreting high-impact laws like the ACA. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 6:49 pm by Amy Howe
  It would be significant if Kennedy were to conclude that this Michigan case was controlled by the earlier busing decision:  he would likely have to choose between (a) voting to strike down the ban (even if, in the abstract, he would otherwise support it) to conform with the Court’s earlier cases; or (b) upholding the ban on the ground that the busing case is no longer good law – a result he would probably like to avoid. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 5:00 am by Jennifer S. Taub
And if that can be proved, [the 4th Circuit] thought they would have a good case. [read post]
4 May 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
A few years ago, I hosted a conference on the career of Justice Anthony Kennedy at my law school. [read post]