Search for: "Thomas R. Evans" Results 121 - 140 of 375
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2016, 7:28 am by Eugene Volokh
The more profound problem (which has thus far escaped Justice Thomas’s attention) is that most of the government’s actions aren’t subjected to any meaningful scrutiny at all, says Evan Bernick of the Center for Judicial Engagement. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Strieff was charged with possession of these illegal items but asserted that the items should be suppressed because they resulted from his having been unlawfully stopped, in violation of the Fourth Amendment.Supreme Court’s Resolution of the Case: Attenuation DoctrineIn an opinion by Justice Thomas, the Supreme Court held that the evidence found on Strieff was properly admissible against him. [read post]
23 May 2016, 1:18 pm by Eugene Volokh
Justice Clarence Thomas says yes, and Evan Bernick of the Center for Judicial Engagement heartily agrees. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
On 19 January 2016, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in R (Miranda) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2016] EWCA Civ 6). [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:21 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Justin Moongyu Lee; Rebecca Taewon Lee; Thomas Edward Kent; American Immigrant Investment Fund I, LLC; Biofuel Venture IV, LLC; Biofuel Venture V, LLC; Nexland, Inc., dba Nexland Investment Group; and Nexsun Ethanol, LLC Case number: 14-cv-06865 (United States District Court for the Central District of California) Case filed: September 3, 2014 Qualifying Judgment/Order: October 29, 2015 11/30/2015 2/28/2016 2015-129 In the Matter of Blackstone Management Partners L.L.C., Blackstone… [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 1:03 am by INFORRM
The Ontario Supreme Court has released an important decision  in R. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Justice Thomas was quiet (again not a surprise since he rarely says anything at oral argument) but gave no indications he is more tolerant of race-based affirmative action than he has been in the past. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Escovedo of Weintraub Tobin on The IP Law Blog Countdown to the General Data Protection Regulation… – Cynthia O’Donoghue and Thomas C. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 6:42 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– Minneapolis lawyer Dennis Merley of Fellhaber Larson on the firm’s MN Employment Law Report 2015 Theme #1: Acceleration of Privacy Class Actions – Chris Naudie, Gillian Scott and Evan Thomas of Osler on the firm’s blog, Canadian Class Action Defence Naturally, It’s Only Natural. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
  Here’s how they work together:Comment b following §908 further states that “[r]eckless indifference to the rights of others and conscious action in deliberate disregard of them (see §500) may provide the necessary state of mind to justify punitive damages. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 9:16 pm by Patent Docs
After unsuccessfully attempting to distinguish the Evans Rejections on the merits, Steed undertook to remove Evans... [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Maker’s Mark prevails in “handmade” false advertising suit – San Antonio lawyer Saul Perloff of Norton Rose Fulbright on The Brand Protection Blog Under Armour Protects Jordan Spieth Investment with Trademarks - Nashville lawyer Kevin Hartley of Trust Tree on their blog, The Root Falls From Heights — A Deadly Workplace Hazard That Is Easily Preventable – Hunstville lawyer Jeff Blackwell of Hornsby, Watson, Hornsby, Blackwell on his blog, Alabama… [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 6:02 pm by Colin O'Keefe
NFL Team’s Disparaging Trademarks – Nashville lawyer Kevin Hartley of Trust Tree on their blog, The Root San Francisco Retail Workers Bill Of Rights – Newark lawyer Laura Stutz of EpsteinBeckerGreen on the firm’s blog, Retail Labor and Employment Law A Smörgåsbord of Standard Characters – Minneapolis lawyer Wes Anderson of Winthrop Weinstine on their DuetsBlog Law Firm Decline and Leadership Mistakes – Hayse, LLC… [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:30 am by David S. Kemp
Evans, in which the Court held unconstitutional a Colorado referendum prohibiting any type of legal protections for individuals on the basis of sexual orientation. [read post]