Search for: "USA v. Williams, et al" Results 121 - 136 of 136
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2008, 7:11 am
  Conference of May 22, 2008 __________________ Docket: 07-976 Case name: T-Mobile USA, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 9:22 am
Teshome et al Assigned to: Hon. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners:… [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution –… [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 3:06 am
General Motors Corporation et al filed 03/12/07 1:07-cv-01401 Acco Brands USA LLC v. [read post]
22 Dec 2007, 7:31 am
Consequently, with the exception of its ruling on the fee litigation issue, the district court's decision is AFFIRMED. 07a0491p.06 2007/12/18 Beattie, et al v. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 4:07 pm
For the reasons stated below, we AFFIRM Defendant's conviction and sentence. 07a0257p.06 2007/07/10 Brown, et al v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 10:24 am
Austal USA, L.L.C. (15-CA-16552, et al., 15-RC-8394; 349 NLRB No. 51) Mobile, AL March 21, 2007. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 6:06 am
Grefer, Joseph, et al., 05-1670 __ S.Ct. __, 2007 WL 559870 (2/26/2007). [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 6:02 am
A lot of things that were either matters of substantive law, or even evidentiary, are now presumptively constitutionalized (precisely the fear of Scalia, et al.). [read post]