Search for: "United States of America v. Duke"
Results 121 - 140
of 192
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2012, 7:50 am
Dukes, 131 S. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
Recent developments in Texas, United States, and international energy law. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 8:28 am
Look at its impact on every country that has it — including the United States. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
Supreme Court, including the Virginia v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:55 am
Newman, Note, Raising the bar and the public interest: on prior restraints, “traditional contours,” and constitutionalizing preliminary injunctions in copyright law, 10 VIRGINIA SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT LAW JOURNAL 323 (2011)Kimberly Nakamaru, Note, Mining for Manny: electronic search and seizure in the aftermath of United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
” (United States v. [read post]
Review of the Effects of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act on Third Party Participation Applicants
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am
“New” Defense: Prior Commercial Use The United States has not traditionally had an express prior user defense or experimental user defense, but such defenses have effectively always been present. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 9:46 pm
As the Second Circuit observed in United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:43 pm
Power, politics, and poison: the story behind National Cotton Council of America v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 8:46 am
Dukes. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 4:39 am
It doesn’t matter that, when Pollard is hurt at a prison the United States of America sent him to, he can’t sue the United States or its officers, and can’t use the United States’ laws for redress. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:25 am
Dukes and AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 8:48 pm
In Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 12:30 pm
—The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply to any application for extension of a patent term under section 156 of title 35, United States Code, that is pending on, that is filed after, or as to which a decision regarding the application is subject to judicial review on, the date of the enactment of this Act. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 6:15 am
In an op-ed for the New York Times, Jeffrey Rosen discusses United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:37 pm
John Fund v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 12:00 am
Dukes Means for Civil Rights Class Actions. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 6:17 am
Mazda Motor of America Inc.: By providing a choice in safety features, federal regulations do not automatically preempt state tort claims against manufacturers.Honorable Mentions: Thompson v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am
PARKER New York : Cambridge University Press, 2011 KF395 .P37 2011 See Catalog Communication in law -- United States TONGUE-TIED AMERICA / ROBERT N. [read post]
