Search for: "United States v. He"
Results 121 - 140
of 48,014
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2024, 8:11 am
In a recent decision, the United States Supreme Court ruled that a lateral job transfer can – in certain circumstances – be an illegal adverse action and support a claim for a lawsuit for unlawful discrimination. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 8:09 am
Far more interesting has been the effects within the domains of Latin American politics, especially among the CELAC states (Community of Latin American and Caribbean States) including Cuba--the competitor organization to the OAS (Organization of American States) including the United States. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:41 am
And in Prosecutor v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
Why, he wanted to know, was the United States suing for an injunction rather than imposing fines, cutting off funding, or waiting for a patient who is denied care under EMTALA to sue for damages? [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:40 am
United States As mentioned above, the US Senate has voted in favour of legislation that could ban TikTok in the country if its Chinese owners refuse to sell. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 6:31 pm
United States (D.C. [read post]
[Ilya Somin] Federal Court Again Rejects Texas' Claim that Illegal Migration Qualifies as "Invasion"
28 Apr 2024, 3:09 pm
" This ruling is the latest phase of the ongoing litigation in United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 2:43 pm
United States. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 1:53 pm
United States Sugar Corp., 492 So.2d 478 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986): Isolated good faith errors in judgment do not constitute misconduct. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
The court found that Egilman had manipulated data to reach misleading conclusions, devoid of scientific validity.[5] Egilman was so distraught by being excluded that he sought to file a personal appeal to the United States Court of Appeal.[6] When the defendant-appellee opposed Egilman’s motion to intervene in the plaintiff’s appeal, Egilman stridently asserted his right to participate,[7] and filed his own declaration.[8] The declaration is required reading… [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm
Moreover, at least three important precedents--United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:02 pm
Cir. 1973) (holding that Section 6(g) “empowered [the FTC] to promulgate substantive rules of business conduct”); United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 10:02 am
Within this due process safeguard (made applicable to the states by the Fourteen Amendment), the “right to remain silent” was born in 1966 in Miranda v. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 5:01 am
" As he feared, Xu was fired from his job and was unable to find other employment in the United States or China. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 12:41 pm
As suggested here, Wood v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 11:39 am
United States immunity case arguments. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 3:45 am
” Yet in 1974’s United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 3:35 am
It is our solemn duty to diligently guard these rights regardless of the crime charged, the reputation of the accused, or the pressure to convict (see Boyd v United States, 116 US 616, 635 [1886] [“It is the duty of courts to be watchful for the constitutional rights of the citizen, and against any stealthy encroachments thereon”]). [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
” Conservatives, Time notes, once looked to universities to “reproduce the middle and upper echelons of Christian society in the United States—something classical liberals from Thomas Jefferson to today’s postliberal academics on the right … have historically appreciated and felt worth conserving. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 6:35 pm
This clause states, in part, “The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. [read post]
