Search for: "United States v. Sterling"
Results 121 - 140
of 251
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2014, 8:42 pm
Sterling State Bank, Inc., 682 F.3d 1091, 1095 (8th Cir. 2012) (quoting Chambers, 501 U.S. at 43). [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 3:35 pm
In 2004, after several years of lobbying, agents of the litigation industry managed to push a policy statement past the Association’s leadership, to condemn the requirement of evidence-based reasoning in federal courts in the United States. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 12:47 pm
Shares of the resources described in paragraphs A and B, shall increase on an annual basis by three unit percent d. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:11 am
Department of Justice has stated that the criminal division has started a far-reaching probe, and that they are “responding aggressively and taking it very seriously. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:39 am
Nineteen female employees from eight states filed charges with the EEOC against Sterling on behalf of themselves and similarly situated employees, alleging sex discrimination in pay and/or promotions. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:57 am
Earlier this week, Military Judge James Pohl, the presiding judge at the military commission case United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 3:03 pm
The official case name is United States of America v. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 7:00 am
Also in FISC-related transparency news: the FISC declassified as much as it could of its latest business records telephony metadata program; I wrote about two issues dealt with in that order: Judge Claire Eagan’s “relevance” analysis in her August memorandum, and addressing Supreme Court Justices opinions in United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 4:27 pm
In Sterling Park v. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 1:28 pm
Sterling Jewelers, 2011 U.S. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 6:00 am
Here’s the New York Times reporter’s petition for rehearing en banc in the case of United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
Although it was the product of a 2-1 split decision, the ruling in United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 1:18 pm
Co. of Connecticut v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 8:44 am
In United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 8:25 am
In its opinion in United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Surgidev Corp., 899 P.2d 576, 591 (N.M. 1995) (“evidence of compliance with FDA regulations was properly submitted to the jury for consideration”); United Blood Services v. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:58 am
Redmond v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 10:00 am
See United States v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 10:46 am
In Broca v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 8:50 am
Last week, according to the Associated Press, a United States District Court for the Western District of Washington jury rejected her breach of contract claim in Hoang v. [read post]
